<p>“KCL, Warwick, Bristol and Durham UG students would smash Georgetown hands down, it is not in their league AT ALL, maybe not Northwestern as it is a top school. Warwick and co are in the Class of Brown, Duke, JHU and UMich.”</p>
<p>Whats your evidence of this? LOL- no considers Warwick in the same class as Brown/Duke/JHU or UMich except you.</p>
<p>No one would turn down Warwick for Brown. Heck no one would turn down Georgetown to go to Warwick except for the fees. Georgetown has exchange links with Warwick and KCL- but only takes students from the War Studies at KCL and the business and history department at Warwick. The rest are considered inferior. On the other side Georgetown students only has direct links with Oxford/LSE/UCL/St Andrews/ Edinburgh. You need a 3.6 to study abroad at Oxford. This is not equivalent to the top honors and is basically average students. </p>
<p>The science or social science students go to UCL, The SFS and Economics/Government/History students go to LSE or Oxford. No one goes to Warwick because they are not seen as a peer school. Warwick and KCL students come to Georgetown and most importantly they struggle with the academics. Mind you these are the best students from top departments at Warwick and KCL. This is personal observation- if you have a similar observation in which Brown Students go and study at Warwick for any program please let me know. Or Duke tries to mix with Warwick students let me know. Warwick is no better than USC or Tufts University and is not a major research university. Its presence in Finance is not even at the same league as UMich Ross not to talk of Brown which is a recruited school for Investment bankers. You can find people from Georgetown working in IBD at City of London, while it would be difficult to find a Warwick student on Wall street.</p>
<p>Warwick= Tufts/USC/UNC-Chapel Hill in reputation and quality</p>