"Reach" for males is not the same as "Reach" for females

<p>

</p>

<p>Why? Why is a ‘diverse’ student body a very important part of higher education? Why is it, in this new age where people are supposed to be equal regardless of gender, sexual orientation, or race, that the interests of molding the social environment to fit the likes of some people is more important than equal treatment for all? </p>

<p>Maybe the girls who got in would rather have the school be 50% male, but what about those girls who weren’t as qualified as the girls who got in- yet are better qualified than some of the admitted males? Maybe some of them would rather have been admitted, even if that meant going to a school that was 60-70% female.</p>