@anomander:
Thank you, you made the same point I was going to, that speed limits are not always set based on safety, nor are the penalties. For example, as a safety factor, speeding as a cause of crashes is not high on the list, so Virginia arbitrarily making speeding reckless driving (with huge penalties) doesn’t match the data. For one thing, if someone is doing 80mph , it generally means the highway is wide open enough to be able to do that kind of driving, it means other traffic is moving and/or there is light traffic. Weaving in and out of traffic to do that is illegal.
Put it this way, when they bumped the speed limit up from the dreaded 55 (which states and towns loved, that generated a ton of revenue when they put that in), all the usual suspects were proclaiming it would cause a surge in horrible accidents, road deaths, etc, and the statistics don’t bear that out, in fact the opposite.
I am not saying there shouldn’t be penalties for speeding, I am saying that putting artificially high penalties on speeding is not about safety, it is about revenue, pure and simple. Reckless driving is when people are driving too fast for conditions (ie the idiots with AWD who go 70mph in a snowstorm cause they have AWD and ABS, and that, folks, has been born out by statistics, that people driving AWD vehicles have a larger tendency to go too fast for conditions), the morons you see weaving in and out of traffic, someone driving too fast in a safety zone (where there really is road construction, not like connecticut where every highway always seemed to be under construction), or my favorite, the person doddering along in the left lane at 45 MPH on a highway, and someone else driving next to them at the same speed. I could see even reckless being 20 mph over the limit, so 85 in a 65 would count, but the way some places have it? Pure revenue, when NJ raised the speed limit to 65, the Whitman administration insisted that they up the penalties for speeding in 65 zones, claiming “safety”, and it is a crock, they had studies that showed that the natural speed on those highways was already 70+, so they knew it would generate a huge amount of revenue…and the death rate on NJ highways, like the country, continued to drop after the 65 was put in place.