Report: 90% of Employers Don't Focus on College Rankings When Hiring

Many of those I know who hire (mostly Civil Engineering) care about which college you went to, but their preferences don’t necessarily match national rankings. They base their decisions about how other grads from the various schools have done and use that to get a feel for how new grads will do (and then sort based upon personality, etc, but getting the interview is based upon college - just not the ranking of that school). They will pick known schools - almost always regional - over one from far away that they have no experience with, esp since “known school” grads also tend to know local regulations that need to be dealt with.

Those I’ve talked to in med school admissions also care, but it’s more of a “level” (as they say), not any particular college and certainly not specific rankings. Chances are, if it’s relatively known (with a positive slant), it’s ok.

Where I work (high school), they don’t give a hoot. It’s all based upon who one knows, personality, and (hopefully) teaching ability, but that last one is suspect at times.

Confirming what Creek said about engineering. 90% of our engineers came from the same group of schools. In no particular order: RPI, RIT, Clarkson, UBuffalo, Union , UVM & Cornell. Its always fun around hockey season.

Now when you get to the top dogs, there is most definitely an ivy bias with an occasional Duke.

“Silicon Valley tech firms, etc. that almost exclusively recruit students from top ranked colleges.”

SV tech firms do not recruit exclusively from top colleges, unless you mean top ranked engineering/CS colleges from say US News, and even then they recruit a lot from lower ranked schools, SJSU and ASU being two examples.

The issue with these kinds of surveys is that a hiring manager or recruiter in SV will fill one out, look at the new college grads he or she hired, see no correlation with ranking, and say it’s not important at all, or maybe 9th out of 10.

Taking out the word, “exclusively,” it isn’t surprising that SV’s top recruited colleges are, well, top engineering/CS colleges: 1) Cal-Berkeley, 2) Stanford, 3) Carnegie Mellon. Sure, SJSU and ASU do make the top 10 list, 8th and 10th, respectively, but the point is that top 3 aren’t targeted by SV as a random occurrence. Top investment firms and law firms, likewise, hire graduates from lower ranked schools just as SV, but they pretty much line up in ranked order as SV.

Law firms, IBs and consulting companies do recruit exclusively (or mostly) at top 10 or 20 colleges but the SV companies do not recruit like them. There is no ASU or SJSU equivalent for those firms, I’m going to guess their 8th or 10th is an ivy.

@TiggerDad can you post a link to the list you are referencing that includes ASU? Thanks.

@Corinthian

https://hiringsolved.com/blog/hiringsolved-identifies-top-skills-backgrounds-make-2017s-wanted-tech-employee/

Most wanted Alumni
1 University of California, Berkeley
2 Stanford University
3 Carnegie Mellon University
4 University of Southern California
5 The University of Texas at Austin
6 Georgia Institute of Technology
7 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
8 San Jose State University
9 University of California, San Diego
10 Arizona State University

Most wanted New hires
1 University of California, Berkeley
2 Stanford University
3 Carnegie Mellon University
4 Georgia Institute of Technology
5 University of Southern California
6 San Jose State University
7 University of Waterloo
8 The University of Texas at Austin
9 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
10 University of California, San Diego

Re: https://hiringsolved.com/blog/hiringsolved-identifies-top-skills-backgrounds-make-2017s-wanted-tech-employee/

That link shows only one list (the first one that you call “most wanted alumni”), and describes it as

Size (overall and of CS majors) likely has a lot to do with it, as does distance. For distance, note that #1, #2, #8 are local, while #4, #9, #10 are a relatively short plane ride.

Note also that smaller companies may have different preferences. For example, they may not have the needs or recruiting resources to do as much non-local recruiting.

Thanks for the links. I posted a thread recently about my D, a HS senior, who is looking at CS options. She’s not a competitive candidate for the highly selective schools and also only got interested in CS as a senior so no STEM EC’s. I posted a separate thread about her list, but she is concerned about rankings so I’ll show her that link to reassure her somewhat about ASU.

I’ll also pass on some advice given to D about evaluating ASU (ranked) vs NAU (unranked) for CS from the perspective of the owner of a small software company (less than 50 employees). These are from my brother who has a BS in CS from MIT and an MBA from Harvard. He acknowledged that ASU will be much better known to employers, but emphasizes that especially once you are 3-5 years out it matters a lot more what you’ve done than where you went. Part of the backstory here is that D prefers NAU overall as a place to go to college but is wondering if she should choose ASU. This is an edited version of his comments.

"[Corinthian] asked me to comment on ASU vs NAU for Computer Science. My viewpoint is that of a software company manager who hires software engineers – though we usually hire people with 3-5 years experience and MS degrees rather than directly from a degree program.

I have looked through the undergraduate CS curriculum shown online for both ASU and NAU. I think they are both covering the subjects that you need to know – more comments on that below. I would actually give a slight edge to NAU for their curriculum in light of current trends. But I do have to say that, for companies across the U.S. who are hiring directly from a degree program, I don’t think ABET or exact rankings are very important, but ASU is widely known as a good school, whereas NAU is not nearly as well known. Hiring managers would probably assume that the ASU curriculum is solid, where you might have to show your transcript from NAU to confirm what you studied.

Having said that: Especially in CS, companies care much more what you have learned (and how well you learned it) and what you can do, than what school you attended. It’s common to have live tests of your actual knowledge, thinking and problem-solving skills as part of an interview process. Once you are 3-5 years out of school, the name of the college or university becomes much less important, and what you accomplished in those 3-5 years becomes much more important. My advice is, no matter where you go to school, also look for edX and Coursera courses you can take and get certificates – these are being weighed by employers today, and I think that trend will continue.

A few thoughts on the curriculum: Both ASU and NAU have core requirements in liberal arts, the physical sciences, and mathematics, which is very good – don’t short-change these. I’d especially emphasize the value of (i) discrete mathematics, (ii) linear algebra especially, and (iii) probability and statistics, because we use this knowledge every day when we build real-world software. Principles are more important (and longer lasting) than the latest popular programming language. When you see “computability and analysis of algorithms”, “computer organization and assembly language”, “data structures and algorithms”, “operating systems” and “networks”, make sure you take those courses and learn from them. Finally, “act like a real software engineer” even while you’re in school: Join the ACM, visit StackOverflow, keep up with what’s happening in cloud computing, AI, etc. University programs are always “playing catch-up” to some degree."

Great advice.

As a business school (BBA) grad, I’ve noticed that while companies outside of top tier management consulting/investment banking, don’t directly correlate hiring to school rank, empirically, there is a strong on campus recruiting/salary/career growth correlation with school tier (Note: I’m referring specifically to careers in business, which tend to be much more prestige conscious than engineering/medicine/law):

  • Our T50 state flagship (UT Austin) and T20 (Rice) private university grads tend to place in competitive F100 Leadership/operations/commercial development programs, well reputed consulting firms (McKinsey/Bain/BCG recruit for regional offices, Deloitte S&O, Strategy& etc.), regional offices of Elite Boutique/Bulge Bracket Investment Banks, and top tier tech (FANG). Placement is national, and $80-100K+ starting salaries are fairly common for anyone who wants those roles. Generally this segment has the highest overall career growth potential, tends to pursue MBAs at top schools, and sees the greatest ROI over the course of a career.
  • Other in-state schools (T70-T150 e.g. Texas A&M/SMU/Baylor/TCU/Tech/UH) that have strong athletic reputations are recruited into general finance/IT/Engineering positions at F100 companies, Big 4 Accounting roles, Back-office finance roles, with some (noticeably less than the previous segment) T2 consulting/Front office finance placement. This segment starts off with decent salaries ($50-70k), places well regionally, and can generally do well enough to settle into upper middle class lifestyles.
  • Directional state schools (T150+/unranked e.g. Sam Houston State, Texas State, UTSA) place into business/IT roles at mid/small companies, admin type roles at large F100 type companies, sales type roles, with some exceptions to the norm. Salaries for this segment can start off at $30-40K ish, and with a double income household, these students can generally settle into middle class lifestyles.

My main takeaways are that most companies recruit for local offices based off of local reputation. Blue chip post undergraduate work experience has a high correlation with top tier MBAs, and further compounds this gap. If you are comfortable with a 9-5 type job and a middle class lifestyle, school doesn’t matter as much. For more ambitions students, undergrad school choice can be a major influencer of ensuing career paths.

Just my $0.02 cents

^^^ “That link shows only one list…”

You need to click on the sideshow…

https://www.scribd.com/document/346963694/Hiringsolved-Ideal-Hire-Report-in-Tech

Re: #31, https://www.scribd.com/document/346963694/Hiringsolved-Ideal-Hire-Report-in-Tech

Again, it seems like size has a lot to do with it. #22 on the top 25 list based on volume of hires (all levels, not just new grads) is not generally considered a high ranking or prestigious university. The list of job placements in the top 25 that they mention include less technical jobs like project manager, account manager, business analyst, inside sales representative, so it is not specific to technical jobs.

I worked in tech. (Now retired.) About the only time going to a prestigious school would have helped would be getting that first interview out of college. After 2 or 3 years of work, the importance of your college plummeted.

@simba9 “About the only time going to a prestigious school would have helped would be getting that first interview out of college” but that first internship or job interview can be critical. In addition, you are assuming you are getting the exact same education and opportunities at the directional school versus the elite college?

Can you be successful not attending an elite college, of course you can, but let’s not pretend that some of the elite colleges don’t afford you some excellent opportunities (Alumni network, interships, study abroad oppos, research, etc.) that might not be available from other colleges.

I don’t know a lot about the tech industry, but from a business standpoint it seems like the kids getting the best jobs out of college are at the better business schools/more elite schools. I realize that is the same point many people are making that this is just the first job, but I agree with @socaldad2002 that that first job can be critical. There are plenty of successful people that didn’t go to elite schools/top business schools, but I completely agree that there is a benefit to going to the “better” schools. I’m sure there are plenty of grads from the more elite schools that end up in worse careers than grads from the less elite schools, but I bet the relationship between “elite” college and financial success is somewhat linear. Not a perfect line but I bet it’s directionally correct.

I graduated from a regional state university (UTSA) for my bachelors and masters degree. I have a job now, and I have interviews with two fortune 100 companies this week. One of them is Amazon corporate HQ. The job is about fit. One thing to consider is how much job experience and work accomplishments outweigh college. Experience and accomplishment is how employers determine if you’re a good fit for the job.

My son is a math major at an elite college. His experience and that of his friends echos the comment of @socaldad2002 “Can you be successful not attending an elite college, of course you can, but let’s not pretend that some of the elite colleges don’t afford you some excellent opportunities (Alumni network, interships, study abroad oppos, research, etc.) that might not be available from other colleges.”

Without exception, every other intern that was working with my son at his summer internship is attending an elite school. These kids all now have jobs waiting for them upon graduation with starting salaries between $225,000 to $300,000+ depending on the company. I am confident in stating that my son would not have received this offer had he been at a different school.

How does anecdata about extreme outliers prove anything? ?

Of course they subconsciously use rankings. Mostly its just the reputation subsection though and not the overall ranking number.

At my kid’s internship they had about 20 interns last summer.

Its not a coincidence the best 5 internships working on a multi-billion dollar capitalization fund went to students from Yale, Columbia, Cornell, Duke and UNC-CH (I saw the intern roster). The less visible internships (law,operational,engineering,policy,IT) were mostly StateU undergrads and grad students. The previous year it was similar.

The best part of it was they made everyone do a weekly wrap-up and a full presentation at the end to the president of the organization. Given the opportunity (and that is really the key), my guy now knows he can compete with anyone regardless of what school they attend.