<p>How can faculty members properly review my work if all they’re given is merely a summation of all my work? I’m submitting my philosophy papers and I can easily say what I did in the papers in less than a page, but I feel as though it’s nearly impossible to evaluate my papers without knowing the arguments (in their complete form) I used to reach my conclusions and all the small, though intriguing and meaningful, points that are found in my papers. Ugh…I don’t know what I’m going to do >_>. Decisions, decisions, decisions…</p>