Horrifying reporting, if you ask me.
The article seems to suggest that the ACT itself was complicit in these wrongdoings, or rather allegations thereof, yet aside from the biased testimonies of disgruntled former teachers and students, was there actually any evidence of any type of cheating or fraudulent activities at any of these places?
Is that what they award Pulitzer prizes for these days: misleading reporting/misrepresentation of the facts?