SAT and ACT concordance tables -- A revision might be necessary

[xiggi]

<p>VOR, it is very hard to follow your arguments. </p>

<p>

Again with the misinformation that I somehow suggested that “Please understand that this is not a discussion about the merit (or silliness) of retaking a 2350, but a dilemma that some students face.” Not once did I broach this subject or even imply such a thing. I merely addressed your proposition with facts that reply to your statements and make sure that kids and their parents don’t start to think that a 34 ACT is somehow equivalent to a 1900 SAT

</p>

<p>??? The “please xxx” was in direct relation to the paragraph about taking the ACT after scoring a 2350. It did not address anything you wrote.</p>

<p>Let’s try to keep it simple. Since both of us are purportedly familiar with the concordance table, should we suggest that TPG should rely on the Page 14 of <a href=“http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-99-02-Dorans.pdf”>http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-99-02-Dorans.pdf&lt;/a&gt; and accept that the one mistake out of 54 on the SAT in November is equivalent to a 33 on the ACT? I guess that is what you suggested by posting “There is a concordance table for individual SAT Math and SAT CR to ACT section equivalence as well that is published by the ACT and the College Boards.” </p>