<p>“so many different arrows/lenses” doesn’t imply that something isn’t standardized. it implies that it is complicated.
ok whatever.</p>
<p>If anyone has a lot of free time, help me look through this:
<a href=“http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1310&context=libassoc[/url]”>http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1310&context=libassoc</a></p>
<p>EDIT: NVM THIS ONE ISN’T IT.</p>
<p>But in the context of the passage, simplification was not impossible at all. It simply described the disorder. I’m not sure how you can defend the claim that disorder would account for the impossibility of a task at hand.</p>
<p>It would be much easier to support that standardization was needed. The tone of the paragraph was emphasizing the necessity to organize the chaos that was insuring because of the introduction of automobiles to an already chaotic traffic environment. </p>
<p>Again, I may be wrong, but these are just my views on the problem.</p>
<p>@Michael</p>
<p>I think that the reasoning for her being proud does not tell us anything about how she judges other people. I didn’t get the impression that she was inclined to make judgements about other people based on that short description of her.</p>
<p>again, it didn’t say “simplification was imposssible,” it said “simplicity was impossible,” meaning that for the circumstances and new-ness of cars in the early 1900s, it was impossible for that time period. sipmlification is the act of something becoming simple, which was possible, simplicity is just the state. i know that this sounds like i’m threading some very fine points here and that the difference shouldn’t be that important, but in this case, it is.</p>
<p>alright, yeah. these are just my views. i’m going to stop arguing, haha.</p>
<p>and @angelofspeed
what is that? what do you want help with? i’m confused</p>
<p>Wait take a look at this - very familiar wording:
[Seeing</a> America: Women Photographers Between the Wars - Melissa A. McEuen - Google Books](<a href=“Seeing America: Women Photographers Between the Wars - Melissa A. McEuen - Google Books”>Seeing America: Women Photographers Between the Wars - Melissa A. McEuen - Google Books)</p>
<p>@000ooo000ooo </p>
<p>Why is setting the speed limit irrelevant? Isn’t that decision the reason that automobiles were legally restricted to stay within the limits of human speed/scale</p>
<p>OH, IT’S THE PHOTOGRAPHY THING my bad, i didn’t see</p>
<p>On what page does the passage for the SAT test begin from? xD</p>
<p>@GoodJobBro Well, actually the statement RIGHT before the description of the cave was that “many volunteers also chose locations for artificial isolation”. I actually put kept away from human contact, because the preceding statement indicated that he wanted to get away from human contact. He only reported what times he went to sleep and such.</p>
<p>@Arctk3: That link should have taken you to the right spot, but the book page is 236 I think. Of course there is a lot of things that have been taken out in between the material relevant to us.</p>
<p>I found the cave passage xD</p>
<p>[Galileo’s</a> pendulum: from the rhythm of time to the making of matter - Roger G. Newton - Google Books](<a href=“Galileo’s Pendulum - Roger G. NEWTON - Google Books”>Galileo’s Pendulum - Roger G. NEWTON - Google Books)</p>
<p>So this makes the question to the question of what question should be asked about the human bio-clock be added, should have been how much influence does the bio-clock encountered? or somewhere along those lines</p>
<p>choosing that he wanted to get away from human contact does make sense, just not as much sense as wanting to get away from sunlight. the passage hadn’t really talked about what human-to-human interaction might or might not do to the circadian rhythm. rather, it was more about how nature/location influences it. so, just following that, a lack of sunlight is a more worthy variable in that isolation experiment than no human interaction. it’s just what the rest of the passage led up to.</p>
<p>@Arctk3: Yay, now we just need the other photograph passage, remember any lines from it? LOL.</p>
<p>Nothing, xD, also I fear I’ve made several mistakes on the CR sections 
(around 10-20 give or take I might have bubbled in the right answer and just thought I bubbled in something else)
because those passages were so god damn long xD, I even had two of them back to back xP</p>
<p>I remember reading a passage on a person who I think became an art curator or something, that passage/section was experimental right? </p>
<p>It talked about how as a kid that person liked the reviews people gave to this certain author, he didn’t actually read the novels but he prided himself,giving himself personal satisfaction when he saw others give good reviews to things just like he did.</p>
<p>@MichaelGScarn</p>
<p>Dude are you actually reading what it says? I don’t mean to be so forward but it clearly says: That man with the red flag racing the car was like a metaphor of traffic itself. It was probably also the last time the automobile existed at anything like human speed or scale. The car was soon to create a world of its own, a world in which humans, separated from everything outside the car but still somehow connected, would move at speeds beyond anything for which their evolutionary history had prepared them.</p>
<p>Not the speed limit. The speed limit has really nothing to do with anything besides that. Do you see why it is a fun historical fact now?</p>
<p>I would totally suggest prepping for the ACT reading section. (has four ~85 line passages with 10 questions each passage for you to complete in 35 minutes)</p>
<p>Afterwards, the SAT reading section just seems so lenient with time. You’ll have like 5-10 minutes left with each section (that could be a good or bad thing. pace yourself, but don’t rush)</p>
<p>can you put the compiled list again? its in one of the threads.</p>
<p>is it philosophy? what do u think…</p>
<p>page 78 yo</p>
<p>Find the photography one! Or the blog one! Those are the ones we really need. Good job though.</p>