<p>Confirmed answers
Let’s keep this updated:</p>
<p>flippant;
dismay;
platitudinous…permissible
cavalier?
sardonic
conceited?
mildly ridiculous
particular…universal…
photographer one: flustered
russian one: details;
satirize her job?</p>
<p>confirm the ones with ?s
WHAT ELSE</p>
<p>“It was to explain the personality. She is portrayed as a oddball the entire time, but she loves her job. Satire is criticism. She was not criticizing archeology (I didn’t think). What did you all put for the photographer one?”</p>
<p>I agree here…and again it is sardonic, without a doubt.</p>
<p>Russian authors was NOT experimental. Conformity was.</p>
Ari7
May 2, 2009, 4:40pm
224
<p>GanDhIizRiPpiN- I said he was flustered about the situation, not that he didn’t like older people</p>
<p>russian authors was not experimental, I dont think. the conformity one was</p>
<p>what did you guys say abt the first archaeological q (scavenger)
i chose soemthing liek she saw archaeology in disdain?</p>
<p>at tilg</p>
<p>but the photographer was barely mentioned, only for like 1 paragraph. it was the different scenario, i am really sure, like 100%. </p>
<p>can someone else on c.c. help out my or tilgs argument?</p>
<p>did anyone else get the venice one? i had CR experimental, but did not get the conformity passage</p>
<p>also, the photographer didn’t know how to handle the situation…and i still think that that the author was shamelessly conceited, and not mildly ridiculing himself…</p>
<p>bobdy - u mean the celeb one?</p>
<p>Skyhigh, what was the question for the answer dismay?</p>
Ari7
May 2, 2009, 4:42pm
230
<p>skyhigh, conceited and mildly ridiculous are two potential answers for the same question, i think.</p>
<p>for the photographer, i put new experience. the photographer was not used to dealing with the roughness of the archaelogists’ work (i think).</p>
<p>What were the possible answer choices to the horn tooting question?
Also, was the Russian passage experimental?</p>
<p>what did you guys say abt the first archaeological q (scavenger)
i chose soemthing liek she saw archaeology in disdain?</p>
<p>Meh, -2/3 is better for me than my last CR (-6 ).</p>
<p>I walked away from this one feeling much better overall.</p>
<p>@ ari</p>
<p>I am arguing for ur side. I agree he was flustered about the situation.lol.</p>
1a1
May 2, 2009, 4:43pm
236
<p>I don’t think it was disdain, something like an account of the narrator’s personality?</p>
<p>buzzardsbay: dismay: what would “the authors” in passage two think about the notions in passage one, celebrity one.</p>
<p>What was the experimental???</p>
<p>lol this is the last time im asking this-- why is the answer dismay instead of uncertainty?</p>
<p>It was account of personality and dismay. I felt certain about those two.</p>