<p>i chose kinship</p>
<p>“did anybody get a passage about the black girl who was sent to school in bordentown?”</p>
<h2>Oratorical means eloquently or formally. </h2>
<p>Not it doesn’t. Oratorical just means spoken, which is quite the opposite.
In literary terms- inflated means pompous or bombastic.</p>
<h2>Insincere sentiments seems to work but what was insincere about the white authors’ writing? InACCURATE? maybe, but InSINCERE? </h2>
<p>Yep, almost exactly what I stated a few pages back.</p>
<p>Go rogue. Join the “old vocabulary” fanclub.</p>
<p>did any1 else also choose kinship for a q??</p>
<p>Oratorical also means “exaggerated, eloquent or highly colored language”</p>
<p>but they went on to say “they accept me for who i am: the daughter of my mother, the niece of my aunt”</p>
<p>i think FLIPPANT is wrong! Here’s my proof I just realized the question.</p>
<p>Based on the context of the passage how would the REPORTER take the author’s comment about “Im just crazy”</p>
<h2>The answer is frank because the reporter does think he is crazy and so it is a frank statement. </h2>
<p>lol it’s hilarious that you says this, seeing as how the next line on the passage was “I don’t think the reporter believed me”.</p>
<p>Then again according to you fruitcakes, it could all just be some subtle sarcasm :)</p>
<p>the ambiguity of these questions is ridic…like if we can offer analysis this deep to justify more than one (sometimes two) answers then they MUST be thrown out…i would email college board</p>
<p>i think FLIPPANT is wrong! Here’s my proof I just realized the question.</p>
<p>Based on the context of the passage how would the REPORTER take the author’s comment about “Im just crazy”</p>
<p>The answer is frank because the reporter does think he is crazy and so it is a frank statement.</p>
<p>^anyone else agree?</p>
<p>Was “conjecture” an answer for something? About some practice being so universally accepted by economists?</p>
<p>^conjecture means theory, the sentence described something that was universally accepted: axiom</p>
<p>what was the answer to the vocab question that was something like
The asian author’s writing was ______ and _____:
she wrote about her family and the immigration.</p>
<p>Also, in those types of questions, does the FIRST word have to define the FIRST part and the SECOND word define the SECOND part, or does order not matter?</p>
<h2>Oratorical also means “exaggerated, eloquent or highly colored language” </h2>
<p>Don’t know what dictionary this comes from, nor do I care. Even if this is true, eloquence and exaggeration are not pompous bombasticness.</p>
<p>I put axiom for that one</p>
<p>“i dont think the reporter believed me” was the opinion of the author. but based on the context of the passage as a WHOLE, wouldnt you think its a frank statement if you were the reporter. of course the guy’s crazy. Remember in the CONTEXT OF THE PASSAGE means you must consider all of it not just that line.</p>
<p>Hey, what did you get for the one about celebrity…where it was like “what would the author of passage 1 think about a writer who was like the edward guy who refused celebrity?” one of the answers was "he was challenging the publishers’…but I was confused totally, and randomly bubbled in “B”.</p>
<p>can sum1 confirm if “kinship” is correct for a q</p>
<p>Shyt. There goes any chance of an 800. Unless everyone else BOMBED worse than I did. Can -3/-4 ever get above 750? Don’t know what I was thinking.</p>
<p>3/4 wrong is generally 750-770.</p>
<p>anybody get a passage about the black girl who was sent to school in bordentown
experimental possibly?</p>