<p>the cheetah one was like "but can only … "
smthing like that</p>
<p>Yeah noble, I said “but it can”… Do u think that’s right?</p>
<p>yea. i believe that was the right answer</p>
<p>So does everyone agree it was a comma-less answer that started with “but”?</p>
<p>@Alvinwolf
Was the original “but it can”? I just remember that the correct version was “but can” but can’t remember whether it was an error or NE.</p>
<p>There was an error</p>
<p>@zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
The cheetah wasn’t NE. I got something along the lines of “but it can”</p>
<p>@chachaseeds and Alvinwolf
Wait, so what was the original sentence?</p>
<p>wht about the essay?
DO you think it was hard?
wht examples did you used?</p>
<p>Does anyone know the vocab word with polypony or something like that ?</p>
<p>How many no errors did you guys get for the sentence errors? I got 3</p>
<p>What was the answer to the root u^2 = 4 question?</p>
<p>@runitek 4</p>
<p>u=4</p>
<p>and did anyone else have a question that asked for what values is (p+5)(p-4)/(p^2-16) define and it gave options I.-4 II. 4 III. -5</p>
<p>or was that experimental?</p>
<p>@noble6
I didn’t have that, so it was probably exp.</p>
<p>@noble6 i got that as well, i got that its defined only for 5, although it was like this: I. -4;II. 5; III. 4. i got that only 5 was defined</p>
<p>was the cheetah one “but it can” or the answer with “however”?</p>
<p>Yeah, I didn’t like the wording of that question. It was unclear if you could cancel it out to make it (p+5)/(p-4) which would make it defined at 5 and -4 which is what I put. Looks like it’s experimental though.</p>
<p>just to be sure, i graphed it on my calc so that it would show a hole at -4 and 4</p>
<p>So are we pretty sure that one was experimental?</p>