<p>can you give me your reason for picking that choice as opposed to a remote location?</p>
<p>It’s remote and exotic location.</p>
<p>it wasn’t animosity, it was antipathy</p>
<p>i put mass of received ideas</p>
<p>this is my explanation from a previous thread</p>
<p>the question refered to lines x-y. those lines said something like “whether being lost in the department store, or adventuring in the khyber pass, the experience of getting lost is the same”</p>
<p>therefore, i really believe the answer is remote and exotic. the author is comparing the safe toy store to the exotic kyhber pass. through the comparison of these two different things he is showing that the “Experience of getting lost” does not have to be adventuring through a dangerous path. Instead, he is saying that “the experience of being lost” is when you are unaware of your surroundings and are experiencing new things with a new capacity.</p>
<p>i really don’t think the author used the khyber pass to show a place that he would enjoy to get lost in.</p>
<p>however, i can see how the other answer could make sense. i guess its just how we were supposed to interpret the sentances. I saw it as a contrast.</p>
<p>oh right, DanishBoy, I think I had that too, something about the iceberg.</p>
<p>but the whole passage talks about him liking to get lost in a big place and the adventure he felt. why would the author compare the mall to an exotic location? i took the passage’s main idea as getting lost and chose accordingly</p>
<p>i had the iceberg thing too, but i cant remember what i put</p>
<p>pandora, did you have two grid in math sections?</p>
<p>i think its definitely a remote and exotic place because it asked about the toy store being viewed through the childs eyes in comparison to the khyber pass and in a childs eyes the toy store was a remote and exotic place</p>
<p>yah i didnt choose the exotic land answer either, it just seem too specific for a passage about someone who likes to get lost and learns a lot from getting lost.</p>
<p>For the commedian one, i think it asked "how would passage 2 say to passage one in quote “…” I think i chose mild cynism since they didnt seem to agree with each other very well.
But dont trust me- im not good at reading passages</p>
<p>the comedian was definitely complete agreement it referred to a quote in each passage and the quotes were almost completely identical</p>
<p>maybe your right i dont know- wait was the commedian a short passage?</p>
<p>jerseypete - you seem to think like me…what did you put for the comedy q- “how did each author feel about the standup comedians?”</p>
<p>i put - AUTHOR 1- said their attempts were futile
AUTHOR 2- praised them for their audacity.</p>
<p>i am almost certain this is right, but i see people given other answers.</p>
<p>NishtDawg: Yes I did have two grid in sections (my previous post: 2 sections from hell or something like that)</p>
<p>yeah thats what i put tim do you know if the gardening passage was the experimental</p>
<p>hey tim555 did you score like 700+ on your verbal section; if you do, i assume your answers are correct</p>
<p>jersey pete- i didn’t have a gardening passage. i had a disneyland passage. so yes i believe that section was expiremntal.</p>
<p>i got 770 in verbal in may if that helps</p>
<p>yea, i scored 740 on april, but 4 out of the 5 questions i missed were sentance completions. </p>
<p>i think i did really good this time, and im cautiously optimisitc i got an 800.</p>