<p>good. thats what i put.</p>
<p>also, what did you get for what do we do when we digest DNA from plants and animals.</p>
<p>I had no idea what to put for that one. I know the choices were like you take the nucleotides and use it for your own DNA, put it into the cell membrane, and some other stuff. What did you put?</p>
<p>I put protein for the DNA digestion one.</p>
<p>Can you explain why it would be protein? I don’t think I put that answer… xD</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>i put that also.</p>
<p>what was the hardy-weinberg one?</p>
<p>please tell me it was the “founders” answer</p>
<p>I think I got random mating</p>
<p>uh-oh. I just checked the old thread. It sounds like it’s protein. <em>dies</em></p>
<p>I still don’t understand the whole evolutionary relationship one. Was it sequence of amino acids? I don’t think I put that.</p>
<p>^ I don’t remember that question. 
I got random mating for Hardy Weinberg as well.</p>
<p>I know the other answer choices were like c) sequence of nucleotides d) sequence of amino acids. I forgot the other ones. I think I put b) which is apparently not right??? I don’t know. What did you put?</p>
<p>well im in anthropology. so i should know this.</p>
<p>lets see, the choices were: fossil record, comparative anatomy, radioactive dating, sequence of dna, sequence of amino acids.</p>
<p>i thought about both fossil and comparative anatomy, because similarites could simply be convergent evolution/analogous traits. but it said EVIDENCE, not PROOF, so i didnt eliminate those. </p>
<p>for radioactive dating, it was sort of the same thing. for example, just because species x is older than species y, it doesnt prove that species x is an ancestor to species y or anything like that. but since it said evidence and not proof, i didnt put that one either.</p>
<p>sequences of dna is definitely not the answer.</p>
<p>so i thought that sequences of amino acids should be the choice.</p>
<p>Ahh that one. I put radioactive carbon dating 
…I guess that’s not right.</p>
<p>I thought that the comparative anatomy was the answer because of analogous and homologous structures.</p>
<p>but fossil record is the same thing. you could be mistaken because of analogous structures. so since both fossils and comparative anatomy have the same issue, i didnt think either one of those could be the choice.</p>
<p>Collegeboard is so trippy.</p>
<p>Aah I have no idea. Grr… I better not miss anymore or else I won’t have a 760-750…</p>
<p>At this rate, anything over 700 is fine with me.</p>
<p>can amino acids even be sequenced for an entire organism?</p>
<p>HAHAHA I looked it up and it was talking about how it refers to the different proteins that are peptide bonded to each other. Apparently, yes?</p>