<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, it was a College Board packet that my GC gave me; ~15 questions per subject; each one with a difficulty rating at the end of the section. Not a full test, of course, but helpful for testing the water.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Ah, and you are certainly wiser than the people who wrote Barron’s.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Great vocabulary! </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Nah, just find it amusing that you use your score to validate your argument.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>WOW, ONE WHOLE QUESTION? Seriously, Gaddafi is pertinent to American history. Do you just care about a score, not knowledge? Like everyone else on CC…</p>
<p>Anyways, did you ever think that this way their review book can still be useful in a few decades when CollegeBoard’s US History catches up with what right now is US History? Besides, the CollegeBoard could change the exam whenever they want to add contemporary USH. Barron’s isn’t “The Official” review, so they don’t know.</p>
<p>Anyways IceQube, you come off as a gigantic ******bag, so I won’t argue with you any more. I just hope the OP picks a review guide that works for them; and ignores that Barron’s was insufficient for the mighty IceQube. Really, even if the tests are hard</p>