<p>@str1256
the x-intercept was -6, checked with a calculator</p>
<p>If it says that he caustically criticized it through his writing, so that seems almost synonymous to outrightly condemning</p>
<p>yeah I predict 22x0</p>
<p>Boohoo. My mom said I have to retake if I don’t get 23x0+</p>
<p>Darn darn darn.</p>
<p>@jugujeegee Don’t worry too much. You’ll do fine, and even if you do have to take it again, you’re sure to do better (now that you have experience and can learn from your mistakes).</p>
<p>Was stodgy among the answer choices of one:
The psychologist or someone else was anything but stodgy, she had a peculiar collection of blah blah blah</p>
<p>@tomato I didn’t have that passage on my test. Maybe that’s your experimental, then.</p>
<p>for the series question (100 2 2 2…), does anyone remember the answer choices? i’m afraid i read the question wrong (it asked for how many were greater than 2–i might have read it as how many were 2). does the answer choice “more than 4” ring a bell? please say no.</p>
<p>what does experimental mean? (sorry I’m noob)</p>
<p>and how can you tell what your experimental is? Does it affect your score?</p>
<p>@mgmtea that answer was 1, only the number 100 worked, every number after that would be 2.</p>
<p>no the answer was one (only 100).</p>
<p>the one with 1000<a<b<10000, i know the answer was 999 but i swear it wasnt a choice. anyone else have the same thing?</p>
<p>@jugujeegee there’s always a section on the test that doesn’t count towards your score (but you don’t know which one it is). an essay, 3 cr, 3 math, and 2 grammar always count–the 1 extra section you get doesn’t</p>
<p>phew that’s what i thought (re: the series question). but do you remember the other answer choices? i’m afraid i read the question as “how many numbers were 2” instead of “how many numbers were greater than 2”. if an answer choice for that question was “more than 4”, then i think i messed up and put that. if not, i’m safe.</p>
<p>@jugujeegee The experimental section is a section that isn’t factored into your score. Technically you’re not supposed to know, but it’s not that hard to figure out if you remember what all your sections were. The standard is that you have 3 CR, 3 math, and 2 writing. One of the math sections should have grid-ins.</p>
<p>@mgmtea The question was asking how many of the terms are NOT 2 (or greater than 2, whatever). The answer was 1. More than 4 was a choice, but not the correct one.</p>
<p>Hmm I got 4 CR.</p>
<p>I hope the section they took out is the one I completely bombed. (it had some questions about DJ’s, and also like some vocab question where the answer was puerile)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No it was a sentence completion question</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You’re a lucky man.</p>
<p>why? Idk if that was the section or not :p</p>
<p>honestly I might’ve had 4 math I can’t remember but I think I got 4 CR.</p>
<p>Jugujeegee, I never had puerile or DJs. </p>
<p>What do you guys think about that one question on the short passage about acting which asked about why the Maret guy would not like the acting method in passage 1? Something like: studying for acting takes a lot of time, or there are many ways to prepare…?</p>
<p>Dellort, does that mean it was experimental then? If you didn’t get it.</p>
<p>yep i got acerbic for the first blank, don’t remember the second though…</p>