<p>Ideas about curves?</p>
<p>Anyone else feel that this was a relatively easy test? Compared to past official SATs you’ve taken and the Blue Book test.</p>
<p>I personally thought it was rather easy. I had one extremely difficult experimental CR involving literary criticism, however.</p>
<p>On the parallelism one I think it was like verb adverbial phrase, verb adverbial phrase, adverb verb. So as long as “preserved adequately” is in itself correct that should be the answer right? Not adequately preserved?</p>
<p>@Superninja I put No-Error for that question. Keeping in mind that this was in the ISE (Identifying Sentence ERRORS) section, not IS (IMPROVING Sentences). Therefore it can only be wrong if it is truly grammatically incorrect.</p>
<p>can someone post the question with the 10^7 to 10^8 answer choice??</p>
<p>But it was incorrect because it broke the law of parallelism right? Usually the SAT is strict on parallelism but who knows…</p>
<p>also for this test, does anyone remember getting 3 consective d’s/3 consecutive answers with the same choices a few times in the test?</p>
<p>OK so the Rhombus had sides of 6. You could break it up into two equilateral triangles sides of 6 each. Angle of an equilateral triangle is 60, and since there are two, you double it and get 120. Now that is 120degrees for each triangle so to find the circumference you do 2(120/360<em>2</em>6*pi)–> that comes out to be 16pi.</p>
<p>Can anyone tell me if the plane going through the sphere problem was experimental or not experimental?</p>
<p>Not experimental, sorry 
so what’s the consensus on preserved adequately?</p>
<p>I think adequately preserved isn’t wrong. The sentence was no error.</p>
<p>@rythmmeleon, yes i precisely remember that in the first reading. it was weird like … DDDBBBDDD</p>
<p>yes I had a few three consecutive answers too…</p>
<p>What were the passages in them?</p>
<p>[c3sml</a> - Tinychat](<a href=“http://tinychat.com/c3sml]c3sml”>Live video chat rooms, simple and easy. - Tinychat) everyone join this chat to discuss the questions</p>
<p>anyone remember any random cr answers that weren’t already discussed?</p>
<p>Do you guys remember the question on the short passage about acting… The one asking what Maret would say about the method of acting in passage 1… Would he say it’s limiting because there are many ways to prepare, or the other answer where it said studying a script is tedious. </p>
<p>Please help</p>
<p>^ yeah, I said limiting as well. I didn’t have that much of a reason I just cancelled out all the other choices. I think it was just the way he dismissed it that made up my mind for limiting.</p>
<p>I do remember this other thing with the acting passages where I put one of the answers that sounds like “can’t tell the difference between a purely mechanical performance”</p>
<p>Did others do the same?</p>
<p>^ i hated that question! all the answers seemed entirely contradictory to what should have been a choice (they all seemed to support passage 2) except for “can’t tell the difference between a purely mechanical performance” which is why i picked it. But there was no direct evidence supporting that, so idk. its a big inference to make for the SAT</p>
<p>what about that question on the acting passage. was is guarded skepticism or outspoked condemnation</p>