<p>In the original sentence (“adequately preserved”), only “adequately” was underlined, not both “adequately preserved.” So I chose E because nothing could be done only to the word “adequately” to improve the sentence.</p>
<p>Well, the adequately was out of place before the verb. “Adequately” should have gone after “preserved.” That is why it was underlined.</p>
<p>I hear people saying that put an answer along the lines of “couldn’t distinguish between a mechanical performance…” from the passage about acting. Can someone tell me what that question was?</p>
<p>Besides, the question wasn’t improving sentences, it was identifying errors. The error was in parallelism, and the identification of the error was the misplaced “adequately.” That’s my take on it at least, I could be wrong.</p>
<p>@Superninja If something was underlined, you can’t move it to another part of the sentence. You can only change within the bounds given. Thus, the answer was E.</p>
<p>Furthermore, there was nothing grammatically incorrect about it. This was in the ISE (Identifying Sentence ERRORS) portion not IS (IMPROVING Sentences). Certainly, the sentence’s parallelism would be improved by switching the adverb and verb, but it is not an error.</p>
<p>why does 5.4 not count?!?!?!?</p>
<p>I guess I see your point @Trumpet, I just wish they didn’t have something that went against parallelism yet didn’t have an answer choice to correct it. Seems like an ambiguous question to me.
And @Rhythm, I put 5.4 as well. People are saying it should be 5.40 but I hope they count 5.4 as correct. Does anyone know the rules for gridding in this case?</p>
<p>Is it common to have two identifying sentence error sections? I had like 40 or so of those questions…or was that my experimental?</p>
<p>the only rule i found for zeros on grid ins is at the beginning. apparently 0.14 must be marked as .14 as 0.14 would be incorrect. i cant find anything for a zero at the end though</p>
<p>AHH thesats1234567 you’re right! does anyone remember if the grid-ins had any decimal answers with a “0” in front? Now I’m super paranoid…</p>
<p>do you guys remember a question in math on venn diagram about 19 students or something</p>
<p>does anyone know what the experimental reading section was?</p>
<p>@DragonSushi The answer was 4.</p>
<p>@juniorhigh Yes, the experimental reading was on literary criticism - at least mine was.</p>
<p>can you explain to me how you got 4?</p>
<p>for the essay…what would my score be if i skipped a line between paragraphs and left like 4-5 lines at the end but almost filled up the space given with 2 big body paragraphs … i think it was a pretty good essay but im jst worried about how score corrleates with space… i need at least a 10</p>
<p>anyone wanna predict my score? im hoping for the best D:
math: -2
critical reading: -2 to 4
writing: -0, but scared about essay</p>
<p>according to blue book curves… 53/54 is still an 800 on math…</p>
<p>does that happen on real sats? bc i got a grid in wrong =[</p>
<p>I was pretty surprised to see no math questions on 30-60-90 or 45-45-90 Right Triangles. Those were pretty common on the practice exams I took.</p>
<p>@FLstudent2014</p>
<p>I had a question where I had to find the length of a line that occurred along two triangles that met at the point. I remember using some sort of 30-60-90 triangle skill for that. Does this mean that one of my math sections was experimental?</p>
<p>@TheNikeTan Unfortunately, one wrong (or one omitted-- they’re the same raw score) is rarely an 800. In December I omitted one and got a 780!</p>