<p>No, that’s the jewelry passage or actually I don’t remember</p>
<p>symbolic…practical was something with goods like gold and jewels and how they have no utility - definitely an SC</p>
<p>i put symbolic…practical</p>
<p>i thought it was subsidary and theoretical…</p>
<p>yes Alex that was the diamond and gold SC that was correct. I do remember thinking about fiscal but they specifically mentioned not for money so that went right out the window.</p>
<p>instead of compiling it every 20 min, ill just wait til tomorrow nite maybe or someone else can take over if i am inactive for too long</p>
<p>on another note, i have 4 wrong for sure now (2 analogies, 2 CR), more depending on which questions belong to experimental</p>
<p>what do you think is the curve this time and how many wrong for 700? </p>
<p>last time i got 2 SC 4 ana 13 CR wrong</p>
<p>i improved CR without that much practice though, while my analogy skills have been utter crap lately.</p>
<p>I remember one about “offhand” and “pivotal”</p>
<p>Can we go over the stars and the jewlery sections??
stars
- purpose of the passage
- commenting on newton’s statement
- magic
- seemingly calm?? (to contrast something)
- author’s attitute about the twinkling stars</p>
<p>jewlery
- purpose of the guild
- something common in art craft and art nuave</p>
<p>AHhhh! I screwed up the Analogies in the CHiMP section completely…and I probably messed up on the Jewelry passage…</p>
<p>Other ones were ez tho</p>
<p>sybolic practical… is there any answer like … ornament? i might misread the question…stupid…</p>
<p>astute
mitigate</p>
<p>Could someone please give me the sentences and any possilbe choices that they remember for those answers.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>I didn’t think it was the disenfranchised one. I thought it was the compromised/garnered one. Registered didn’t seem right.</p>
<p>flipchick, I agree, I put compromised/garnered as well…</p>
<p>Wow ho ho ho. What’s this compromise/garnered crap.</p>
<p>Can anyone give the question. I’m pretty sure they were “disenfranchised” which led them to register for a lawsuit. How can you garner a law suit?</p>
<p>they weren’t registering for a lawsuit, they were “collecting” or “garnering” something in order to file for a lawsuit. I can’t remember exactly what it said.</p>
<p>Garner is to acquire, or something like that, so you acquire a lawsuit? I dont know, it looked better to me…</p>
<p>Nevermind…just looked disenfranchised up…looks like it has to be it…</p>
<p>No it doesn’t, either disenfranchised or compromised would work for the first part, the second part is the disputable part.</p>
<p>garner is usually used to discuss movable physical material or concepts. Like garnering hope or money. A lawsuit would sound and seem bad. Register is to enroll, which would make more sense when discussing a lawsuit.</p>
<p>Also, disenfranchised is a nice juicy SAT word that fits perfectly, although compromised would work, disenfranchised is very clean and direct, something ETS loves.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the exact phrasing. I just remember seeing that question and being convinced that there was something wrong with register, because they weren’t registering for the lawsuit. It simply talked about a lawsuit, but not for that verb. I wish I could remember how it was worded!!!</p>
<p>I looked register up in the dictionary. Although it doesn’t really fit perfectly with the context, I feel it works far better than garner does.</p>