<p>Having reviewed NASAD’s and SAC’s standards of accreditation, I could never put my finger on what - if anything - was lacking for NASAD. As a student, I didn’t experience anything I felt was a problem and that was over ten years ago. Nowadays, I rub elbows with a few profs who complain about this and that (mostly about work loads) but they still get lots of vacation time and some decent perks. </p>
<p>A lot of people blow it out of proportion, but the fact is that the college continues to grow, and place students in well-paying careers. So, something right is happening regardless. In retrospect, it seems that Richard Rowan’s ego was always the primary problem, and he’s been gone for a good while.</p>