<p>I’d been under the impression that SCI_Arc was just as expensive as the rest.</p>
<p>Cheers and I seem to have found something we can agree on at last. I’ve had the opportunity to hear the opinion of professors that have taught at several of the LA architecture schools, and they seemed to agree that SCI<em>Arc produces some extremely creative people, but at the expense of all practical concerns, and expressed that they would shy away from hiring SCI</em>Arc grads with less than five years working experience. The idea there being that if they made it through five years of work, they’d have made up the practical learning that they’d missed out on in school, and they’d rather that learning come at the expense of another firm.</p>