<p>does anyone remember the answer choices? for the remuneration one</p>
<p>answer choices for remuneration? or the sentence?</p>
<p>Remuneration I remember also had the answers “notification” and “solicitation” which were both clearly wrong. It was about workers not getting paid enough…</p>
<p>i remember crossing out ebullient for the question whose answer was nuanced… i chose phlegmatic, foolishly</p>
<p>i do no remember an ebullient salutory question at all…</p>
<p>Murdered =/</p>
<p>Ok here it is
- Longevity
- Characterize … mountainous
- Ameliorate … exacerbate
- Remuneration
- Abstemious
- Malicious
- Controversial … hypothesis
- Suspended … suffered
- Obstinate
10 Olfactory
11 Obstreperous
12 Iconoclast … skewered
13 Nuance
14 Deceit … willing
15 underestimated … complexity
16 undaunted by
17 parity
18 synthesize … interweaving
19 Vitriolic … savor</p>
<p>Any objections??</p>
<p>19/19</p>
<p>I agree.</p>
<p>Seems right to me :)</p>
<p>i agree.</p>
<p>sadly 15/19, but oh well.</p>
<p>i guess i missed about 10 total…but I was aiming for a 660, so I still have a very good shot!!!</p>
<p>i think underestimated…complexity is wrong.</p>
<p>I put exagerated…intricacy.</p>
<p>b/c it says that the scientists took the fact that protein SIMPLY coiled for granted…meaning they didn’t think it could be that simple, so they exagerated it’s intricacy.</p>
<p>wow nice i got all of them…good job with the list</p>
<p>No, underestimated/complexity is definitely right. Intricacy means it’s complicated, if they exaggerated the intricacy they would have overcomplicated it, when in fact they were oversymplifying it.</p>
<p>18/19
Obstreperous? I’ve never heard that word before. Back to the vocab list, I suppose.</p>
<p>^ they were overcomplicating it…because they took the simpleness of it for granted.</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure on this one.</p>
<p>17 parity</p>
<p>what was the sentence for this???</p>
<p>Parity sentence: “Blah always treated his kids with ____, sharing things equally between them”</p>
<p>Something like that.</p>
<p>'^ they were overcomplicating it…because they took the simpleness of it for granted.</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure on this one.'</p>
<p>^They underestimated the complexity. They didn’t realize how complicated it was; they thought that it simply folded and that was the end of it.
I’m sure on this too.</p>
<p>I had no idea what parity meant, but it sounded right.
Looks like I got 19/19. Hooray! And I’m pretty sure it is underestimated is right.</p>
<p>The father treated both sons with _____, giving unfair leniency towards neither…not exactly but basic idea…</p>