<p>
</p>
<p>69 is correct, what about the person who is a computer genius, should they be allowed to leave?</p>
<p>They raised their hand knowing that there was an obligation. End of subject, period, dot. Anyone attending the SA has the ability to walk away b4 yr 3. Nobody would hold it against them for following the dream, but if you stay after that it is expected you will serve out your obligation.</p>
<p>69 gave great examples earlier about 3 different scenarios for current mids. Lets expand off of that…</p>
<p>They graduate, take a flying slot and owe 8 yrs…3 yrs into it, an airline approaches them and offer a handful of money, the precedant has been set, why can’t they argue that the service allowed the athlete out, thus they shouldn’t be required to fulfill their obligation. Or how about the doc, (they surely can make more $$$ in the civilian) isn’t a doctor more important to our society than an athlete?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I disagree…you are opening Pandora’s box…heck, legislation would have to be made about who qualifies to step out…Would the law state if you pay it back than you can leave?</p>