<p>Well, that makes sense, but a good survey system goes up to contemporary literature, not just 1914 and then general American literature. The same would be true for British literature. Perhaps that’s what I noticed. No matter. I’ve already indicated that different schools have different pedagogy on purpose.</p>
<p>I am devoted to Barnard, my D’s school, but if I ruled the world I would definitely tweak their English program, for which they are duly noted. Their first year seminars are spotty – some excellent, some not.</p>
<p>I think even things we love dearly and deeply can have flaws, not to suggest that Smith’s English Dept. is flawed. And if not flawed that somewhat different than we would wish. I have run into these feelings with Williams, my son’s school too.</p>
<p>However, I am happy to concede that I was mistaken in every aspect in perusing the catalogue so hurriedly.</p>
<p>I should have left my advice to the OP to peruse the catalogues side by side and decide for herself. I will in future.</p>
<p>I am not trying to belabor this and have already made apologies. I was trying to help the OP. I have nothing against Smith’s English Dept. which I am sure is excellent.</p>