<p>Hard numbers and not just anecdotes. Some research papers that quantify the admissions disparity among different racial groups:</p>
<p>Princeton admissions
<a href=“https://www.princeton.edu/~tje/files/webAdmission%20Preferences%20Espenshade%20Chung%20Walling%20Dec%202004.pdf”>https://www.princeton.edu/~tje/files/webAdmission%20Preferences%20Espenshade%20Chung%20Walling%20Dec%202004.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>Duke admissions
<a href=“http://public.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/grades_4.0.pdf”>http://public.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/grades_4.0.pdf</a>
</p>
<p>The Duke data is especially interesting. Since the admitted Asian students had high rankings for “Essay” & “Personal Qualities” (i.e. leadership & ECs), it would seem to dispel the stereotype that they are bookish automatons. But you can see that they pretty much had to clear a higher bar for everything (not just SAT scores) to get admitted.</p>
<p>Ivy admissions
<a href=“http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/”>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/</a>
<a href=“http://www.theamericanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/asians-large.jpg”>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/asians-large.jpg</a></p>