<p>The reason everyone trains in Michigan is an accident of history: two of the leading coaches moved there and worked together. What happened is that Marina Zueva came there and then Igor Shpilband “defected” just before the end of the USSR and, it seems, she helped him get a job in the area. They eventually started working together and that attracted a handful of the other top coaches and that created a cluster in which the coaches and athletes could exchanged skills, grow, etc. The two original coaches have now split up and that has spread their influence to more skaters. Even the bronze medal Russian girl trained there for 2 years - when she was like 15. </p>
<p>BTW, if you’re into this stuff, Zueva choreographed Ekaterina Godeeva and Sergei Grinkov’s pairs routines. They were dominant - and married. Grinkov died during practice when he was 28.</p>
<p>This kind of clustering thing happens all the time in business. Want an odd one? For a number of years some decades back, the best fencing schools in the country, competitive at the world level, were Wayne State and University of Detroit. Why? Because a few Hungarian coaches defected and ended up in Detroit. </p>
<p>As to Scott Moir’s comments, probably true in the way he probably meant it, which is their coach saw more opportunity to raise Davis/White’s scores and thus they got more attention. Not a lot, but if you look at the intricacy of Davis/White’s skating, you can see how that can be true. Did it mean anything? Probably not. The reality is Davis/White have been better for a few years because they skate very technical programs with more technical accuracy. Moir/Virtue are perhaps better artistically but not as technically perfect and perhaps not as technically difficult in some of the footwork. </p>
<p>I find it funny to hear about judging, considering we don’t know which judge’s scores are even counted and that, as I noted above, the technical moments are each graded by a technical judge separately. </p>
<p>I think it’s also pretty humorous and reflective of the internet era that every speculation becomes repeated until it’s treated as fact. So for example, a Toronto Star opinion piece I mentioned yesterday is now cited as an “article” instead of what it is, which is a columnist paid to state an opinion forcefully doing exactly that without reporting behind it. </p>
<p>(BTW, I’m not saying one judge may not like Moir/Virtue’s skating compared to White/Davis’. That’s always going to happen.)</p>
<p>I also wanted to mention in regard to Bode Miller’s interview that it’s important to remember the reporter/TV microphone holder was almost certainly being told in her earpiece to keep asking about his dead brother. The fault is with the producers and then the decision to air the footage without editing. And she should have ignored what was in her ear, but she’s an employee and …</p>