<p>Good lord swish so much is wrong with your posts. So you consider someone with only “exposure to religions, philosophy, govt/poly sci, history, world lit and [having the ability] to communicate effectively what was learned” to be educated? It sounds like you have a ways to go before you’re educated yourself.</p>
<p>I’m not disagreeing with you that perhaps the components above are part of a balanced education, but to equate them with being educated and to relegate other areas of learning to “trades” is downright ignorant.</p>