<p>@Datalook, very interesting article. It basically confirms the narrative from the city officials on the matter. It makes no sense to continue arguing with phantasmagoric, who is creating a modified narrative (regardless of what he calls it) to support his contention of what he thinks went down, about the importance of evidence that has already been hammered out. Yes, it gives another narrative, the one supported by phantasmagoric, as well, but this narrative, just like phantasmagoric’s portrayal of what went down, does not come from people involved in the decision-making process.</p>