<p>Again, its one thing to be skeptical of statements made by politicians, but another thing to create an altered narrative from these statements without sufficient reason/evidence to do so. Questioning statements from politicians (and, this case, politicians charged with overseeing a multi-billion dollar land/school deal which ultimately will face public scrutiny from other politicians and community officials and the press), while relying on narratives pushed by those who are not in the know and have their own reasons to push a certain narrative, isn’t gullible. Its plain foolish. Having no reason to question the truthfulness of Bloomberg’s and other officials involved in the decision making process (nor reasonable evidence to support any such questioning), I rely on what was reported by the decision makers. This is the best evidence we have. You take the opposite approach. That is a major difference we have on remaining issues. Do note that you’re very selective and inconsistent with taking statements made by politician decision-makers at face value, as you’ve have accepted such statements when they’ve suited your narrative. You are attempting to have it both ways.</p>