Stanford is pathetic

<p>

</p>

<p>“It appears” sounds awfully vague. Want to provide support for that claim, specifically for Stanford?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I don’t think anyone’s arguing that there are interesting kids who scored really high on the SAT. The argument is that admitting a class of solely those kinds of students would yield a class wholly less interesting and diverse (in the broadest sense of the word) than what we have now.</p>

<p>I think we can agree that Stanford’s class is much more well-rounded than Caltech’s–partly because it’s much larger (allowing for more variety), partly because Stanford is not a tech school, and partly because Stanford is just more interested in admitting a diverse class (again, in the broadest sense) than Caltech is.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Prescribing morals is never a good path to take…</p>