<p>
</p>
<p>That’s why I said “may…and this is even questionable.” (I don’t know if you said that I was prescribing morals or saying that I was circumspect in not doing it)</p>
<p>The diverseness and how interesting a place is, is IMHO (notice opinion), would probably not be increased by practicing AA or legacy. I think that athletic talent and special talents would increase diversity and how interesting a place is. However, this argument is moot, because it is not practical for Stanford (for reasons that go way beyond competitive edge and how interesting Stanford is at least directly) to allocate a spot to athletic talent/special talents and then academic superstars while not leaving room for minorities or legacies and for that reason arguing the justness of Stanford’s admissions process is not fruitful.</p>