As I mentioned in my earlier post, Stanford’s Clery geography is unusually broad and picks up a lot of reported crimes that do not involve students. One example is the Stanford hospital. As Stanford explains in its campus crime statistics report: “Because of their proximity to the Stanford University campus, and because medical students receive training at these medical facilities, the Department of Education has advised Stanford University to count Clery-reportable incidents occurring at the Stanford Health Care Adult Hospital at Stanford and the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford as ‘on campus’ crimes.” If I understand that correctly, that means this article from yesterday confirms that this one hospital tech is responsible for at least 4 reported “on campus” sexual assaults, none of which involved Stanford students in any way. http://mv-voice.com/news/2016/06/30/former-stanford-anesthesia-tech-gets-year-in-jail-for-molesting-patients That is a terrible situation in and of itself, but not what most people think of as a campus crime. Again, when you are trying to “rank” crime statistics at different colleges it is important to understand what the statistics actually show.
And @fredthered, with regard to your quest to find convictions, Stanford’s most recent crime statistics report (for 2013/2014) shows no arrests for any sex crimes in those years so it seems unlikely there were any Stanford students convicted in connection with any of the sexual assault incidents reported during that period. Further, as recent events confirm, any criminal case involving a Stanford student naturally gets a lot of headlines, so we probably would have heard about it if there were any. Nevertheless, as others have pointed out, these crimes are infrequently reported and even less frequently prosecuted, so a count of successful criminal prosecutions would tell us little.