<p>“3) Stanford’s yield hit record high while others hold steady”</p>
<p>well why cant u attribute the increase in stanford’s yield to its popularity and educational (also graduate) quality that is second only to harvard (or piossibly even beyond)? Why do you have to see this record phenomenon in such a negative light, simply emphasizing the possble use of Tufts syndrome? Now also dont bring in all the ‘issues’ regarding changes in EA/ED policies in some schools if u were about to. Yes, Stanford decided to keep its SCEA, but since even the accepted students can turn it down (sinces its non binding), EA can only help the yield slightly, if not at all.
I really dont understand Matridaddy.</p>