<p>@harvardfan: Harvard has four times more faculty members than Stanford has, so Stanford lost in “publication impact” battle. Harvard has more NIH money than Stanford has, so Stanford lost that one too.</p>
<p>On that website, MIT is behind Michigan, can we say that Michigan is better? why did you go to MIT, not Michigan, if you truly believe “Scientific Papers” representing the quality of a school?</p>
<p>Wisconsin was top in the power electronic research back in 1990s. There were 5 faculty members back then, but Zhejiang University had 70 faculty members doing the same thing. Can we compare these two schools by finding out who had more “Scientific papers”?</p>