<p>
</p>
<p>That chart is from the Collegeboard. I just found it on Wikipedia.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Well from the passage you quote, you seem to believe IQ is a somewhat accurate measure of intelligence. I agree that SAT isn’t a prefect indicator of intelligence. But SAT score has a 0.8 correlation with IQ. I say that allows one to confidently conclude SAT score generally reflects intelligence.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Who would disagree with this statement? I sure wouldn’t and I didn’t. The inner city school is surely worse. Blacks, on average, surely have a worse educational experience than whites. </p>
<p>I actually made a mistake in my last post. I meant to provide the following chart showing racial scores at given economic levels.</p>
<p>[File:1995-SAT-Income2.png</a> - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1995-SAT-Income2.png]File:1995-SAT-Income2.png”>File:1995-SAT-Income2.png - Wikipedia)</p>
![http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1995-SAT-Income2.png]File:1995-SAT-Income2.png](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1995-SAT-Income2.png%5DFile:1995-SAT-Income2.png){kind=link}
<p>I think it’s safe to assume that students at a given economic level are receiving basically the same educational quality. Yet, despite this, the disparity is huge at every level.</p>
<p>Even comparing acorss income levels, the poorest Asians (basically dirt poor), score about 25 points better than the richest blacks. You’re telling me those Asians, undoubtedly mostly the children of poor, non-English speaking immigrants, living in ethnic ghettos, receive a commensurate education to that of a black person whose father got a graduate degree?</p>
<p>But the best comparison is in a given economic level, where blacks significantly lag whites and Asians. </p>
<p>I’m really curious what your explanation could be for this. (I’m honestly not being sarcastic.)</p>