<p>Isn’t the point of this thread the $3k bill received from a lawyer OP did not contract with? Written, orally or otherwise. I don’t think I would speak with the neighbor about this. Not at this point. Nor would I worry about whether it’s double billing or a portion the neighbor refused or sunspots or whatever.</p>
<p>Isn’t the central issue that a 3k bill was received? Implying (initially, at least,) that you are liable for 3k? And, so, the matter should be directed back at that lawyer. It does not matter to me if the neighbors told him to send a portion of the bill to you, conveyed the wrong impression to him, are aware or not, haven’t paid their portion of the bill or etc. </p>
<p>What matters is that OP discharge this bill she and DH did receive.</p>
<p>To much speculation and a leaning toward DIY. No one has clear understanding here that, on payment of the $500, the rest of the bill will be cancelled. It does no good to speculate or assume. Nothing is in writing-- except that bill.</p>
<p>As shown in the arbitration quote (granted, out of context,) it is the attorney’s obligation to explain suffficiently to you. Not for you to get the bill and enter into negotiations from the get-go. </p>
<p>If you don’t want to consult you own attorney or friends who are attorneys, then send a letter now to that neighbor’s guy. </p>
<p>I am deleting my own suggested wording because I think the above says it well enough. -Though, I think you should say only that you are willing to “consider” the $5xx.</p>
<p>I would NOT cc it to the neighbor. Why not? Partly, I assume you have your own respectful reasons. And, because you have stated and restated that you are willing to pay the $5xx, the primary and immediate purpose/need is to get rid of the other $2500.</p>