<p>Seems as though Palin supports the workers of Alaska over the polar bears. The topic of polar bears may play well in blue states, but what about red?</p>
<p>*Indeed, packed houses at community meetings helped slow the six-year negotiation to a crawl, and time may now be running out for Bush administration officials who support the deal.</p>
<p>Gwichin Indian leaders say they are worried about pollution from oil spills in the vast wetland basin. They also fear changes to their hunting and fishing territory that would come with a road connection to the outside world.*</p>
<p>I don’t buy the courageous label, at least about the bridge to nowhere. She was originally supportive of it, but when she finally nixed it, Alaska needed to find an additional $329 million to fund it, and the federal government had already told Alaska that they could take the earmarked bridge money and instead put it into their general highway fund. So she upset the residents of one small town, big deal. Alaska got a nice bump to the highway fund.</p>
<p>I find the polar bear issue very troubling, and not because I think they’re cute and fuzzy. It’s Bush redux - let’s ignore or quash the scientific evidence if it happens to conflict with our economic self-interest.</p>