Support for LateToSchool

<p>LTS: of course you didn’t offend. As for the LAF, they are one of the few organizations dealing with research on enhancing quality of life for survivors. Many organizations focus on beating the cancer and forget the person afterwards. My husband has been active raising money for the LAF and for the Leukemia/Lymphoma Society (his lymphoma is in remission); they have very different goals. </p>

<p>As for those organizations with awareness days… well, I don’t know anyone else with my particular adult bone cancer, except through the internet group I belong to. When I describe it to people, they say “I never knew.” So maybe people are aware of cancer… but how many people know that more women die from lung cancer than from breast cancer? (It’s about twice as many per year.)</p>

<p>LTS, so delighted with the news!!!</p>

<p>I hope and pray that, should I ever face cancer, I will have the resources at hand that LA and/or LTS have/has. </p>

<p>I fear that, should I have to exceed my company’s annual sick-day allotment (and after 2 decades of self-employment, I do know how fortunate I am to have both paid medical insurance and sick leave), I might be terminated. It would actually makes sense from a business perspective under the current system. I get 5 days personal/sick leave a year. How long would that last if my diagnosis were similar to LTS or LA? How could a medium-sized business (let alone a small one) offer more time under current circumstances?</p>

<p>dmd77, I agree with your point about some types of cancer needing “awareness.” For example, ovarian cancer has very vague symptoms and is very frequently mis-diagnosed as a digestive disorder; by the time a correct diagnosis is made many valuable months have passed and the disease has moved from a very treatable stage 1 or 2 to a less than 50% survival rate stage 3 or 4. But really, do we need Breast Cancer Awareness or AIDS Awareness? Is anyone not aware of them? Those two diseases need research and cures, but Awareness? Sometimes I think these “awareness” events are more so the celebrity/person/group holding the event can feel good about themselves than they are with helping patients or funding a cure.</p>

<p>But back to LTS’s good news. “Stable” is a good thing! Yay!</p>

<p>While I don’t pretend to have any particular medical expertise (and invite anyone with more knowledge to correct any misstatements here), it seems that part of the difficulty with “cancer awareness” is that there are so many different types of illness - 100s, apparently - that are loosely grouped together under this single umbrella term “cancer.” (In the mental-health field, “schizophrenia” is likewise, I understand, a general umbrella term that encompasses many different types of illness.) Not only do different types of cancer differ in the organs that are affected, they also differ in the types of cells within those organs that are affected. And all of these differences in location and cell-types, in turn, can make for significant differences as to cause, prognosis, and treatment. </p>

<p>All of this, I guess, is a long way of saying that given how various this disease is, it’s not surprising how little “awareness” there sometimes seems to be. It’s not just one disease; it’s a multitude.</p>

<p>[Cancer</a> Research UK | CancerHelp UK | How many different types of cancer are there?](<a href=“About Cancer | Cancer Research UK”>About Cancer | Cancer Research UK)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>–Vincent Van Gogh</p>

<p>LTS, I’m so glad for the happy liver news! (maybe that didn’t come out right?)</p>

<p>Keep the good stuff coming!!</p>

<p>Congratulations on the great scan! I hope you are beginning to feel stronger.</p>

<p>Epistrophy - here is an oversimplified explanation of cancer. Normal cells reproduce by division when then are mature. The new cells “grow up” and start the process over again. Each cell has a certain function in the body, so along with reproducing, mature cells also have a function in their “society.” The older cells die off, and the new mature cells take over the functions as responsible adults.</p>

<p>Cancer is when there are too many babies having babies. The cells divide before they are mature. The new cells do the same thing. So the cell division becomes too rapid - since they are dividing before they are “grown up.” And they are not mature enough to perform their intended function, so the body loses the benefits of that particular kind of cell.</p>

<p>Depending upon which cells are doing this, the effect on the body is different, and the “kind of cancer” is different.</p>

<p>The goal in treatment is to get rid of the immature, non-functioning cells, without killing off the necessary ones!</p>

<p>[Disclaimer: I’m not usually up this early - had to get D on a plane. Hope this is not too off the wall.]</p>

<p>As always, LTS, thinking of you. Happy to hear of the arrested development in the liver, and hoping for strength for a new day!</p>

<p>Best wishes LTS. Though I might not know you well, I can already see the strength in your heart and words. All the best, LTS.</p>

<p>and another</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[Pan</a> Mass peddlers unite - Wenham, MA - Wicked Local Wenham](<a href=“http://www.wickedlocal.com/wenham/sports/x469170429/Pan-Mass-peddlers-unite]Pan”>http://www.wickedlocal.com/wenham/sports/x469170429/Pan-Mass-peddlers-unite)</p>

<p>(P.S. to Binx: Yeah, I believe I understand all that. And my point wasn’t that there isn’t any commonality among different types of cancer. Rather, my point was simply that there are so many different types of cancer, with so many different causes [insofar as they’re even understood], prognoses, and treatments, that it can potentially be very misleading to try to think of this illness as being all of a piece; considerations that apply to one type of cancer may well not apply to many others.)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[BBC</a> NEWS | Health | Tobacco ‘could help treat cancer’](<a href=“http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7517799.stm]BBC”>BBC NEWS | Health | Tobacco 'could help treat cancer')</p>

<p>To follow up on binx’s post. </p>

<p>All normal cells have highly organized mechanisms for: DNA repair, senescence (stop dividing) and apoptosis (orderly death). Cancer cells are defective in all three. Defective DNA repair leads to accelerated changes in the chromosomes, enabling cancer cells to acquire growth advantages as well as faster division and resistant to apoptosis. Moreover, it enables cells to alter its genetics so that they become resistant to chemo drugs. Defects in ensuring DNA integrity during cell division lead to massive changes in chromosomes, losing some pieces or moving one piece of the chromosome to another. Therefore, cancer cells in a tumor is highly heterogeneous, hence the difficulty of using a “magic bullet” to kill them. Moreover, the same type pf cancer cells among different patients may be highly different as well. Almost all the current chemo drugs utilize this DNA repair defect to kill cancer cells and relying on the ability of normal cells to repair themselves. Some of the newer drugs aim at the growth of cancer cells (e.g., the drug that Martha Stewart got into trouble with or the drug that attenuate blood vessel formation around a tumor). </p>

<p>Because cancer cells retain the characteristics of their origin, a breast cancer cell can differ from lung cancer cells importantly. For example, most breast cancer cells will still need a certain hormone for growth maintenance and a hormone-based drug is effective in many cases. </p>

<p>The new theory however places the blame of cancer cell origin on a stem cell that run amok. These cells are already immortal (will not senesce) and can be programmed to divide, become a mature cell or senesce. They become cancer cells when these highly organized programs become defective. If this were indeed the case, finding these cancer stem cells will be the key. However, it is truly like looking for a needle in a haystack. Moreover, the field of stem cell is at its infancy. We know little about how it transition from an immortal to a regular cell and how their programs go bad. Nonetheless, we live in an exciting era, with the possibility of defining the root of a cancer.</p>

<p>Hope you’re feeling well today, LTS, as you recover from the procedure.</p>

<p>Sorry, Epistrophy. I suspect you are one of the smartest people I know – Didn’t mean to sound like I was talking down by oversimplifying - I just think it helps in general to think of the word cancer as the process, rather than the symptoms/cures. As you stated, the actual “disease” any individual might have is more specifically named based on things like location and cell-type. Padad has the more cerebral, detailed, (and accurate) description. But for feeble minds like mine, I sometimes need a more basic structure to hang the details on.</p>

<p>Just got some “pre-cancer” frozen off my face this morning. Came home and had to wade through a variety of books and websites just to see what it might have turned into. Skin cancers alone are widely various. My previous cancer was also completely unrelated to LTS’s - in location, type ( -oma = tumor), treatment, etc. They are only similar in that they were up to no good!</p>

<p>binx and padad…thanks for your descriptions…those really “nail” how evil and predatory this nasty disease is. LTS…keep on keepin’ on!!!</p>

<p>I’m still looking forward to seeing you campaigning for president 4 years from now in your purple socks!!!</p>

<p>And, even Gleevec, probably the best-known of the “magic bullet” drugs, does not target the stem cells that researchers now know start this disease process. When I was first diagnosed, the thought was that Gleevec, by eliminating the 9/22 translocation, would cure the disease. They now know Gleevec does not go to the crux of the matter – so those of us on Gleevec are on it indefinitely. It presents interesting issues about long-term survivorship and economics.</p>

<p>astrophysicsmom, as much as it pains me to say this, I believe that image is a factor in voters’ decisions. Therefore, I think LTS will need to hide the purple socks in her closet and wear the red heels during the campaign.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[Julia</a> Roberts to Host Dave Matthews Charity Concert - Music News, Dave Matthews, Julia Roberts : People.com](<a href=“http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20215978,00.html]Julia”>http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20215978,00.html)</p>

<p>(P.S. to Binx: Since when did trying to be helpful - by explaining something - require an apology? Hey - no need!)</p>

<p>living with lung cancer - and the medical bills</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[Benefit</a> to help long-time Cary business owner :: News :: PIONEER PRESS :: Cary-Grove Countryside](<a href=“Chicago Suburbs News - Chicago Tribune”>Chicago Suburbs News - Chicago Tribune)</p>