<p>Please don’t jump on me for saying what I am about to say-- I say it with as much desire for support and concern as all the other posts here. That said, I am posing a gentle suggestion to those of you encouraging or cheering on a potentially adversarial relationship with treating physicians. [Note: I am NOT saying at ALL that LTS has done this- she hasn’t.] Certainly if a doctor-patient relationship isn’t a good fit, then time for a change. But the battle should be with the illness, not with the doctor. Sometimes patients feel little sense of control over their illness, and sometimes the feeling of lack of control can accidentally roll over into the relationship with the doctor. From what LTS has posted on CC, she is clearly a bright, independent, diplomatic and strong-willed individual, who I am sure will put all her best skills to use in taking this life challenge head-on. There is nothing wrong with wanting more information as to why a particular medicine is being ordered, asking to discuss the pros and cons, and discussing alternatives or treatment strategies. Knowledge is power. If an anxyolitic or sedative isn’t necessary or desired, then certainly discussing this with one’s doctor is appropriate. It is better to have a good working relationship with a doctor. They have experience, training and responsibilities in the care and management of their patient (which of course includes the responsibility to discuss the treatment and the risk/benefits of all recommended treatment). Yes, it is good to self-advocate, but it is better to forge a good working relationship with a doctor, or in some cases, as LTS has done, change doctors (though sometimes it is hard to find someone else in a timely fashion who is available quickly, has hospital priviledges and is on one’s insurance network, if that matters). As for the steroid, again, there are risks and benefits of steroids, and it sounds like LTS had the opportunity to discuss these with the prescribing physician and is electing to hold off for now. If things change in her condition, she might choose to revisit this. Unfortunately, one of the side effects of steroids is its effect on mood, and the psychiatrist might be needed then. So, again, its a good idea to have a decent working relationship with one’s treating docs. I agree, if one wishes to terminate a relationship with a doctor, it is helpful to have this documented in the patient’s chart. It protects the doctor as well as the patient, as the doctor doesn’t want to be sued for patient abandonment or something. Doctors, especially those doing inpatient work, usually have a relationship with each other, and refer back and forth. So, if one doctor perceives the patient as difficult, this could possibly, inadvertently, affect the overall view of the patient. It stinks, but it is human nature. </p>
<p>When my s was in the hospital last spring with his broken leg, he kicked up a fever of unknown origin, and it lasted for days. The surgeon thought it was probably a normal reaction to surgery, but just in case, called in an internist. All labs were negative (normal blood cell counts, no evidence of infection, no blood clot, etc) but he decided to order a broad-based antibiotic just in case. My s took one dose, but then refused to take any more when the labs all came back as normal. First, he had had a very bad, potentially fatal reaction to an antibiotic in the past that landed him in the hospital for 4 days, and second, he is philosophically opposed to taking what he felt was an unnecessary antibiotic and potentially lowering its efficacy in the future, if needed. Both are perfectly reasonable reasons not to take an antibiotic. But, my s was pushing to be discharged (we were in Calif at the time and he wanted to try to get back to college in another state, and we live in yet another state across country). Well, needless to say, if s wasnt going to take the antibiotic, he wasn’t going to get discharged (especially as we were from out of town with no local treating doc to transfer care to). The nurses tried to talk him into taking the meds, and he had a very eloquent conversation with them about his position. He asked to speak to the internist. They discussed the situation, and the internist said he could call in an infectious disease specialist to help evaluate any possible additional causes of his fever (you can pick up some nasty bugs in hospitals). But, it would take a couple of days to culture out the labwork, and he’d be stuck in the hospital until then (unless he chose to leave AMA (against medical advice), at which point the insurance wouldn’t pay the bill). Lousy situation to be in. Oh, and since he’d already started the med (took one dose), it is better to complete a course of an antibiotic than to stop mid stream. That can cause an increased resistence to antibiotics in the future. So, son reluctantly agreed to take the antibiotic. His fever came down and he got discharged, and we were able to get him back to college. What made his fever go down? We will never know.</p>
<p>Please don’t attack me for presenting another side. Maybe, hopefully, I misread the cheering on of doctor-trouncing. All I am saying is that it is best to have a good working relationship with one’s docs. Sounds like LTS is doing her best to establish that (and to put together the best team for her care), and again I wish her all the best in this new life challenge. She has all the skills to be as successful in this one as she has in all the others we have read about here. I still smile when I think about her story of the long que at the airport, and her daughter’s telephone job interview!</p>