<p>
</p>
<p>It was $315,000 per student as of June 2005. You’re right. “OK” was probably a bit understated. “Pretty good” would probably be more accurate.</p>
<p>You know, this whole thing started because I said that Swarthmore’s Tri-Co consortium was not as tightly knit as the Claremont Consortium. I think that’s an accurate assessment.</p>
<p>As for Pomona’s role in the Consortium. Is it not true that Pomona (as an institution) as viewed as somewhat standoffish compared to the other schools in the group? If that’s not true, it is certainly a perception that is voiced rather frequently on the various Claremont forums. Maybe I’ll check with Xiggi!</p>
<p>I believe it to be true that BMC and Haverford students view Swarthmore as being somewhat more aloof from the Tri-Co Consortium. I don’t think Swarthmore students really care one way or the other. Some take courses at BMC and Haverford and Penn; others don’t.</p>