I want to echo what AggieDreamin is saying about holistic admission weighted heavily on stats.
Please do not think I am being negative or discouraging. This is just how I wrap my head around a non-transparent process that can leave a lot of high performing students without their desired outcome.
This is last year’s admitted data.
2019
49,700 total apps
26.4% - Top 10% 13,100
10.9% - Academic 5,400
4.7% - Review full 2350
6.0% - Review Alternative 3000
(23,850 total or 48% admitted - 23,733 or 56.8% admitted in 2018)
Only 2350 students were admitted to college station out of review. Just think about how few kids that really is. If you look only at review candidates, and take auto and academic admits out of the mix - you are looking at about 17% getting full or alternative admission.
There were roughly 31200 review applicants in 2019. You get that number by looking at the whole number of applicants minus the Top 10% and Academic admits (Review Full and Review Alternative - plus the 25,000+ PSA and denied.)
So 7.53% of review applicants were granted full admission. And 9.62% were given alternative admission. So in total 17% of review applicants were granted full admission, Gateway, Blinn TEAM or the engineering academy. In other words - less than 20 percent of all review applicants were granted admission.
Our students on this forum have really solid stats and would do well at TAMU. My daughters come from one of the “highly performing” schools - like lots of other kids in this board do. I look at things analytically. If TAMU is accepting 17% of review candidates - how does an application stand out if you are not in the top 17% of your graduating class and top 17% of test takers. What additional content is on the application? Athletic skills that allow you to play on a D1 level? ROTC scholarship and plans to serve, first generation college student, attend a 20th century scholar school?
Plus engineering is a whole separate beast - with at 74% acceptance rate due to all the different full admit pathways. So some of the review alternative stats above are the engineering academy at Blinn. Meaning that the the percent chance of being admitted review as a non engineering major is even a little less than 7.53% and 9.62%.
But the great thing about TAMU is that they really make an effort to have clearly defined paths like PSA and PTA to get to college station. And they seem open to transfers too.