@sherpa - the first think you have to look at is how much pass through income is being claimed.
This is in “PART II—DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED BUSINESS INCOME OF PASS-THRU ENTITIES”- https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr1/BILLS-115hr1enr.xml
This section is very confusing, but basically I am interpreting it to mean that if a taxpayer has income from a self-employment, partnership, or other pass-through business, and overall income is below the “threshold” amount ($157,500 for a single taxpayer, twice that for married joint return) – then it is a deduction of 20% of all of the pass-through income. So if someone’s income was derived entirely from one or more pass-through businesses in an among of $100,000 – then that person would have a $20,000. Keep in mind that “taxable” income (TI) will often be LESS than the net income from self-employment – there are various deductions that reduce AGI, plus the standard or itemized deductions which are subtracted from AGI to arrive at TI.
All of the complicated stuff to reduce that 20% kicks in only for higher taxable income amounts. Just as easy shorthand, I’ll call these taxpayers “rich”. (And yeah, I know that someone who has $158K a year in annual income isn’t exactly a bilionaire … I’m just using “rich” and “poor” in this explanation as a simple shorthand to differenitate between above and below threshold taxpayers.)
As I understand it, the original Senate draft said that for rich people, they could only have the lower of either their 20% deduction or 50% of the wages they pay. So maybe that’s where the word “Jobs” ends up in the bill title – this is saying that rich business owners will have to pay out an amount equivalent to at least 40% of their net profits in wages if they want that full 20% writeoff. (Doesn’t matter if they have 20 low paid employees, or 1 very highly paid employee - but they need to be paying out as twice as much to employees as they are claiming as a deduction).
Then the addition changed the formula and said that as an alternative to paying out so many wages, the rich business owner could get to that point by paying combining a figure equal to 25% of the wages they pay out and 2.5% of the cost basis of qualified (undepreciated) property. So let’s say the business owns property acquired for $20 million. – so 2.5% of that is $500K. And lets say that payroll for that company is $200K - so we add in another $50K (25% of payroll) – and that means that business owner can potentially take a $550K writeoff-- but still no more than 20% of his profits from the business.
Compare that to a business with the same payroll - $200K-- but no capital assets. That other business owner is limited to a $100K writeoff at best (50% of payroll) – so that real estate essentially represents $900K in wages that the real estate-owning company doesn’t have to pay. (Because the employer without capital assets would have to pay $1,100,000 total in wages in order to qualify for the same benefit.)
So this looks like a huge windfall for businesses that have extremely high profits and own high value real estate.
I looked to see if there is some upper limit on how much can be taken as a deduction – and maybe ther is, but I can’t find it. I am confused as to how this plays into AMT.
To add one more confounding factor, the rich business owner, with or without real estate, cannot be any trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services. (But the “poor” business owner – with “poor” being temporarily redefined for this explanationas having less than $157K in income, or twice that if married – has no such limit).
I really am not certain that my interpretation of this convoluted and complicated set of provisions is accurate – maybe there are other provisions that limit the overall amounts that can be deducted — but I think you can at least see what generated the uproar. (If I am reading the law wrong, I’m probably not the only one. But tax rules really can be complicated to figure out).
