With all due respect, the VMI case dealt only with the standard for maintaining a ** male only admissions policy ** at the school and it dealt with whether the standard imposed was closer to the strict scrutiny standard used to evaluate race-based discrimination rather than the less rigorous intermediate scrutiny.
I am asking a different question. I’m asking only whether people object to the very common and seemingly accepted practice of ** coed ** schools using holistic admissions to balance the makeup of their classes so that the number of men is roughly equivalent to the number of women. There’s no strict quota in place and both genders are affected, depending on the school and the major.