<p>Boudoir photos of your wedding? What is this world coming to?</p>
<p>That’s it? One night? Amateurs…;)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>God, how incredibly boring except possibly for those who are SUPER close (like a sister). Even so, I don’t know that I would have been terribly interested in seeing my sister’s positive pregnancy test strip or her naked pregnant belly in a picture - I know what a naked pregnant belly looks like having had one, so what’s so interesting about seeing someone else’s?</p>
<p>This is why Facebook is a bad investment.</p>
<p>Will they post a break up album too? Maybe the first fight needs to be remembered in an album? I am glad my fuzzy brain is able to gloss over some of the rougher points of marriage.</p>
<p>EPTR- that’s what the ignore or hide buttons are for :D.</p>
<p>If it keeps a few struggling photographers in business… Ok, people are free to do anything they wish as long as they keep it legal and to themselves.</p>
<p>They need to start saving for their future kid’s shrink bills NOW.</p>
<p>I about spat my tea on the computer when I saw the one photo of the couple’s feet with the guy’s jeans down round his ankles. That’s just beyond tacky. I have this image of the photographer lying on the ground pointing his/her camera at their feet and saying “OK - drop trou NOW”. Well, at least the brides knickers weren’t round her ankles.</p>
<p>swimcat! Aack! Because of your post, I looked at the link for the first time. Ewwwww.</p>
<p>There should be a law that you have to be married for at least 20 years before you are allowed to share such photos - hopefully during that time these couples will learn what private and decorum means.</p>
<p>After having endured engagement photos, wedding photos (professional and candid), taking the mandatory honeymoon pictures to show family upon return, the LAST thing I wanted was yet another camera anywhere near me. Serious narcissism.</p>
<p>I showed the link to my recently married daughter and her response was “classy” (yes it was sarcasm in case that does is not apparent on the net).</p>
<p>Actually, I know a couple of people I can just see doing something like this - people for whom photographing an even seems more important than the event itself. Fortunately one of them already got married so missed this particular boat, and the other is getting married to a young man who I think would shoot the idea down pretty quickly</p>
<p>One of the comments on the link was “50 Shades of Ugh.” LOL</p>
<p>I have a close friend with a D the same age as mine. This D has a close friend who is starting her photography business. Friend does lovely work, from what I can see online. I was invited to view photos of: the gender reveal party, the growing baby bump, the final bump, and now the newborn shoot.<br>
If I could have afforded it and she was working then, I would have had this young woman take photos of my babies. Beautiful shots. The bump stuff, no. the whole gender reveal stuff is totally distasteful to me, so no also.</p>
<p>I’m disappointed . . . I thought this thread was going to be about mix tapes!</p>
<p>Really. The growing baby bump. Here it is at 3 months, now 4, now 5…</p>
<p>Oh my gooodness, it gets bigger every month!!! That’s so interesting!</p>
<p>I abhor the term baby bump.</p>
<p>^^^^^ agree!!</p>