<p>I agree with a lot, up until the “g” argument. The SAT tests intelligence very well in reading comprehension and mathematical/analytical skill. That’s not to slight the SAT- those two things are often necessary to succeed.</p>
<p>I personally agree with Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory. I think one can be bad at reading and math and still be extremely innovative in their thought, for example. Or creative. Or artistically gifted. And A LOT of people do extremely well on the SAT and severely lack all of those other things. The SAT is probably the most reliable indicator that colleges can use, but unfortunately they and no other test can tell the entire story. </p>
<p>Then again, SAT’s are a much better indicator than extracurriculars, which more and more measure how desperate a person is to go to a high-ranking college.</p>