<p>^There’s no reason it should be debunked though besides sour grapes from alums of schools that didn’t fare well on the WSJ Ranking. It’s based on accurate data and tries to capture a narrow metric (professional school placement) so it’s definitely the most reliable of the bunch posted by the OP. Sure, they should have included all of Stanford’s professional schools and maybe Duke Med or something to add to geographic diversity of the programs the evaluated but hey guess what, Stanford and Duke do fantastic on the WSJ Ranking (better than every Ivy besides HYP).</p>