<p>Those are not facts, those are your hysterical and bigoted opinions. Perhaps a dictionary would help?</p>
<p>Go look it up yourself sweetheart. We’ve left Kansas, Dorothy.</p>
<p>
Agreed!!!</p>
<p>Don’t ever call me sweetheart again.</p>
<p>Is it just me or does Romney look like he would con your grandmother ? He just doesn’t look right. It’s either Huck or Mac for me… not just because they have badass nicknames…</p>
<p>You really can’t give the top dems any good nicknames, except the billary thing but that’s silly, and the obama –> osama thing is just too off-color and rude for me.</p>
<p>Wow, another 3.5 minutes of my life i’ll never get back, rambling pointlessly on CC… again…</p>
<p>gottalove: do you participate in threads on the students’ forum? Just curious.</p>
<p>Greonveld9: Gosh, so glad to hear that you are basing your decision on matters of substance.</p>
<p>I have had the same feeling about Romney, but couldn’t place my finger on why…you just gave me the answer. I agree he is just too slick for me.</p>
<p>I only see Romney as slick in the context of sliding away – as in not sticking in my brain. I find him a total non-entity. I really wish Thompson was a realistic possibility but, of course, he’s not. Nobody great but it IS interesting.</p>
<p>gotta love those southern accents too</p>
<p>I am a Fred fan, and I have been disappointed in him, I am hoping he is laying back to get a VP slot…my ticket McCain/Thompson.</p>
<p>Huckabee and how he is attacking the others reminds me of Hillary…</p>
<p>I could be pretty pleased with a McCain Thompson ticket.</p>
<p>Think about it, McCain would carry the southwest states, Thompson carries the southeast</p>
<p>
If you are going to compare the candidates based on physical appearance, then I would say Romney is probably the most attractive except for the hair. In fact, if we rate the candidates based on physical appearance, the list would be:</p>
<p>Romney
Edwards
Obama
Thompson
Huckabee
Clinton
Guilani
McCain</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you rated them by voice, Thompson would be first and Clinton last.</p>
<p>But then again, I will vote based on their the merits of their policies.</p>
<p>I would put Obama up there in terms of voice.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I would say that anyone who likes to call a group of people “Jesus freaks” ought to check his own bigot status.</p>
<p>
The reason I feel so confident of a Republican victory in the fall is reflected in the strategy outlined by Karl Rove. His ideas are pretty much common sense. (I should have offered one exception in my prediction – I am assuming the dems will nominate clinton or obama; if they nominate edwards, it will not be a certainty of republican victory).</p>
<p>[TheHill.com</a> - Rove previews strategies against Clinton, Obama](<a href=“http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/rove-previews-strategies-against-clinton-obama-2008-01-16.html]TheHill.com”>http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/rove-previews-strategies-against-clinton-obama-2008-01-16.html)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>How well did the Rove strategy work in 06? The only way Republicans may win as if they start race-baiting Obama and I wouldn’t put it past them. </p>
<p>Either way, the Republicans are divided and fractured. I don’t think they will recover till 2012 and it’ll probably end up with Evangelical domination.</p>
<p>
How well did it work in 2000 and 2004 Presidential bids? Pretty well. It looks like Hag Hillary is already race baiting (or at least according to Obama supporters).</p>
<p>Gottaluv are you a republican? I am guessing from your posts your are not. Your statement about the republican party being fractured has no merit if you are not. Think about it, how much credit would you give a republican who said the dem party is fractured and divided (Hillary and Obama are making headlines everyday for their mud slinging)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It’s not just my opinion. It’s almost common knowledge. There’s sharp divisions within the party although a certain amount of hatred unites them. </p>
<p>Even though Obama, Edwards, and Clinton aren’t holding each other’s hand the debate among the Democrats is much more nuanced and based on personality. When it comes to Iraq, Bush Tax Cuts, Health Care, choice, civil unions, and pretty much everything Democrats are in agreement.</p>