"There's no difference between 2300 and 2400."

<p>

</p>

<p>Yes, that’s correct… </p>

<p>But what the data does indicate is that for each section taken individually, there is at least a 5% increase in admissions percentages when you go from the 750 – 790 range, up to the 800 range. For some sections it looks to be around 8% or so.</p>

<p>Assume what you say to be true. There is no difference between 780, 790, and 800. Well that 5+% increase has to come from somewhere. So given that hypothetical, it has to mean that there is a huge difference between the 750-770 range and the 780-800 range. I guess that’s possible, but I don’t see the reason that is more believable. To me it’s just more plausible that the chances increase fairly uniformly as scores increase at that level. I think the only time a school would consider a lower SAT score to be better (all other things being equal) would be in the case of strategic admissions. </p>

<p>Would you pay $50 if you could magically change your 2350 score to 2400? I bet 99% of examinees would. If just about everybody, deep in their hearts, didn’t really believe an additional 50 points were worth at least $1 each, nobody would make a deal like that.</p>

<p>Do I believe there is a huge difference between a 2350 and a 2400? Or even a 2300 and a 2400? No. But I believe there is a difference. </p>

<p>But anyway, I’m not a true believer on any of this, so I’ll let my argument stand here. I hate the CollegeBoard with a passion and until recently argued the opposite point of view with equal vigor. I just changed my mind looking at the totality of the information. . If somebody shows me new data I’ll look at it.</p>