Henceforth, we shall refer to you only as Montmorency. ![]()
^@caraid ( now known As Montie) I mentioned earlier that I abandoned TMItB fairly early, way before the creepy chapter 16. I’m thankful for this discussion for making me appreciate the importance of this iconic story,
But, it wasn’t as @ignatius, described some of her books, “not my cuppa tea” …
But, I hope you are able to read To Say Nothing Of the Dog, so much more enjoyable and the tie ins to previous selections is spot on, and fun, like “Easter eggs” as @mathmom mentioned.
Re: To Say Nothing of the Dog, here is a delightful interview with witty and glib Connie Willis. I particularly enjoyed her comments about including her dog, Gracie in any novels. She is a hoot!
I am going to start To Say Nothing of the Dog today. I’m putting down Three Men in a Boat and walking away. Your Pal, Montie
^^^ Post after you finish TSNotD. I’d love to hear your thoughts on the book.
@jerseysouthmomchess, thanks for the link to that interview. This part really resonated with me – a sign of the times, I suppose:
Connie Willis mentioned in both interviews posted (by you and @ignatius) that she is fascinated by the plague. I was thinking she’d really like The Weight of Ink, as it moves beautifully back and forth in time, with a strong focus on the Great Plague of London in the 1660’s.
Aside from those dark observations above, Connie Willis is very funny! Several parts of the interview made me laugh.
Also, considering that my only criticism of To Say Nothing of the Dog was that it could have used a little editing, I found her comment about short stories vs. novels interesting:
So, Connie Willis and short stories: I like (and own) this:
^ Ha! That was one of the things that made me laugh in the interview:
I don’t know David Sedaris’s essay about Easter customs is hilarious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0yqn_OK6eE
I am sitting here lol’ing at one of the discussion questions for *To Say Nothing of the Dog/i. I had copied and pasted them from a library site, and I’m scratching my head at #9:
Either the library forgot to remove a question from an earlier selection, or I missed something major in To Say Nothing of the Dog. Maybe I read the abridged version intended for fifth-graders in Hong Kong. ![]()
Animal species, maybe? I like both Cyril and Princess Arjumand. I have cats and Willis nailed the behavior. It made me laugh.
Or maybe she meant the butlers - I like both Baine and Finch. In truth, they almost seemed another species too. 
I assumed the question was just about cats and dogs, but you could probably make a case for swans.
^^^ To say nothing of the fish …
Lol to all of the above suggestions!
Also, thanks for David Sedaris’s take on Easter.
One more pressing discussion question to answer:
The question refers to hypochondriac Jerome’s reading through a dictionary of diseases:
“Housemaid’s knee is also known as prepatellar bursitis. It is caused by inflammation of a small fluid-filled sac (the bursa) in front of the kneecap. It more commonly occurs in people who spend long periods of time kneeling. Treatment is usually supportive only and the outlook is generally very good.”
Michael Palin and Tim Curry star in the 1975 film version of Three Men in a Boat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9xvrbfyKGQ
I don’t have time right now to watch the whole thing, but it really is just like watching Monty Python. Oh, and there’s a 1956 version as well. Although it seems to take huge liberties and is cut short, so don’t recommend it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SomyFLLbjh8
I finally finished Three Men in a Boat!!! (No need to alert the media!) I have finally figured out why it took me so long. I think it is because there was no real story. Each chapter was almost a story in itself. I could almost see it as a serialized story with a chapter a month in a periodical. While each chapter was interesting and amusing, sometimes, I never had the feeling that I had to read the next chapter to see what was going to happen next. It wasn’t gripping at all.
I liked To Say Nothing of the Dog so much better. And I will say that I appreciated it so much more after I finished. I could almost see a series of books on Ned and Verity’s time travel adventures. I will definitely look up her other books.
The dog in To Say Nothing of the Dog was much more important than Three Men in a Boat. The dog in TMiaB seemed almost an afterthought in the title. After reading the first, I was disappointed in the part played the dog in the second.
That being said, TMiaB was beautifully written. I was amazed at what a good writer Jerome was. Some of his images were just beautiful.
@silverlady, you got it exactly right – Three Men in a Boat was originally serialized in the magazine Home Chimes. From a 1959 article about Jerome in The Guardian archives:
Lots of interesting tidbits about Jerome in the old bio: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/may/02/jerome-k-jerome-three-men-in-a-boat-centenary-1959
Pretty much how I would expect women to be portrayed by a young, male humorist in 1889. There was a sprinkling of sexism throughout, but I wasn’t really surprised or offended. A reviewer on Audible noted, “The full prejudices of the age are on display, but somehow don’t seem malicious. If unthinking racist, classist, and sexist attitudes would destroy your enjoyment, then this book won’t be fun for you.”
@mary13 enjoyed your link to Jerome’s bio. Became curious about his wife, and found this.
Imagine if he had written “Honeymoon: a Man and a Woman in a boat, who lived to talk about it “
From wiki
“
I also learned from the various bios that the family surname was originally “Clapp.” Jerome’s father changed it to “Jerome” – resulting in both father and son being named “Jerome Jerome.” Jerome’s siblings were Milton Melanchthon, Paulina Deodata and Blandina, so I think there was a wee bit of eccentricity in that household, which may have inspired some of Jerome K. Jerome’s offbeat humor.