<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Are you saying that because you “think” that is the case or because you actually know so?</p>
<p>Let me help you all out by linking you to the “requirements” page for both the FBI and CIA.</p>
<p>[Federal</a> Bureau of Investigation](<a href=“http://www.fbijobs.gov/1111.asp]Federal”>http://www.fbijobs.gov/1111.asp)
[Federal</a> Bureau of Investigation](<a href=“http://www.fbijobs.gov/1112.asp]Federal”>http://www.fbijobs.gov/1112.asp)</p>
<p>The CIA is very broad but I’m going to assume that the type of person that wants to be a Special Agent in the FBI is the same type of person that wants to be part of the Clandestine Service of the CIA.</p>
<p><a href=“https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/core-collector.html[/url]”>https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/core-collector.html</a></p>
<p>It’s split into two programs:</p>
<p>
For noobs - your “top 15” graduate.
The real deal.</p>
<p>Many “top X” graduates want to work for the FBI and CIA, but it doesn’t mean they actually get to. I’m willing to bet a substantial amount of money on the fact that there’s a higher correlation between employment as a SA or CC and military experience (like BIGeastBEAST said) than between employment as a SA or CC and being a “top X” graduate.</p>
<p>This line of work wants you to bring REAL skillsets to work because they actually need to get “mission critical” tasks done (no BS). A “brand-name” pedigree is not an predictor of such in any way shape or form.</p>