The Deputy Director (DD) did state that feedback so far suggested most of these SIC kids already had plans. Perhaps last minute funding is routinely used for PR. Presumably, one would have to apply and demonstrate some evidence of financial need (perhaps a sources and uses calculation or something like that). If all the SIC kids had financial means, they either wouldn’t have bothered applying or would have submitted a request for consideration like everyone else. There is a difference between a personal invitation to apply, and reserving the funds only for certain groups.
College kids think all sorts of thoughts about their peers. This year on CC was no exception in cataloging many lamentations over “weak” students of first gen or minority status who were selected for elite admissions while tippy top unhooked applicants were ignored. Have personally never run across any parent who isn’t shocked and appalled by such an outburst. However, the world is a big place and I dwell in but a very small corner of it. (And for all I know, polite company could be lying about what they truly think).
What actually sits wrong with me, personally, is not some dumb-headed opinion by an ignorant or bigoted undergrad in no particular position of authority at the College, but dumb-headed opinions by administrative members who ARE in such a position. That ADA was overtly presumptuous and displayed unapologetic prejudice against some kids in favor of others and it’s probably a good idea that he/she isn’t around advising students any longer. It just seemed that the ADA crossed the line somewhere in his/her comments to the Maroon. Wonder if there was even a thought as to how it came across.
To me this whole dust-up is so “UChicago” - even in the scandals, they aren’t quite up there with the Big Guys (yet).